The small sphere hypothesis implies the small gap property

Let GG be a finitely generated, virtually nilpotent group with the Small Sphere (SS) Property. For r(0,1)r\in(0,1), define the small gap property (SG property) by requiring that there is some δ>0\delta>0 such that

limnηn(G,δ)>r,\lim_{n\to\infty}\eta_n(G,\delta)>r,

where

ηn(G,δ)=min{ρ(A,B):gB(A)<δ, A,B subballs of G, A>n}\eta_n(G,\delta)=\min\{\rho(A,B):g_B(A)<\delta,\ A,B\text{ subballs of }G,\ |A|>n\}

and

ρ(A,B)={CA:CAB is a subball}.\rho(A,B)=\left\{\frac{|C|}{|A|}:C\subseteq A\cap B\text{ is a subball}\right\}.

Small sphere to small gap conjecture. Then GG has the SG property. The SG property would provide the ball-intersection control needed for the SBM theory; it is known for Zd\mathbb{Z}^d with standard generators, but the source reports no verified non-abelian examples and leaves the general implication open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ryan Burkhart and Isaac Goldbring, “Subsets of Virtually Nilpotent Groups with the SBM Property”, arXiv:2206.10683 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.