Subconvexity conjecture for the Rankin–Selberg convolution of Siegel cusp forms

Let FF be a Siegel cusp form of weight kk, and let R(s,F,F)R(s,F,F) denote its Rankin–Selberg convolution. The critical line is

Re(s)=kn+14.\operatorname{Re}(s)=k-\frac{n+1}{4}.

Subconvexity conjecture. There exists δ>0\delta>0 such that

R(kn+14+it,F,F)t,n(Ress=kR(s,F,F))kn(n+1)4δ.R\left(k-\frac{n+1}{4}+it,F,F\right)\ll_{t,n}\left(\operatorname{Res}_{s=k}R(s,F,F)\right)k^{\frac{n(n+1)}4-\delta}.

This would improve the convexity bound by a power of kk and is the subconvexity estimate needed for the paper's analysis of Rankin–Selberg convolutions.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Hidenori Katsurada and Henry H. Kim, “Rankin-Selberg convolution for the Duke-Imamoglu-Ikeda lift”, arXiv:2206.05969 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.