Trace counterexample classification conjecture

About 4 years old · traced to

Let c1,c2,…,ckc_1,c_2,\ldots,c_k be integers with ci≥2c_i\geq 2, and let Mq(c1,c2,…,ck)M_q(c_1,c_2,\ldots,c_k) be the associated matrix. Two sequences are considered equivalent when one is obtained from the other by a cyclic shift. Trace counterexample classification conjecture. Up to cyclic shifts of ⟦c1,c2,…,ck⟧\llbracket c_1,c_2,\ldots,c_k\rrbracket, the examples listed in the paper's counterexample corollary are the only counterexamples to unimodality for tr(Mq(c1,c2,…,ck))\mathrm{tr}(M_q(c_1,c_2,\ldots,c_k)). The claim seeks a complete classification of failures of unimodality under the condition ci≥2c_i\geq2, building on the explicit counterexamples displayed immediately beforehand.

References

Primary source

Ezgi Kantarcı Oğuz, “Oriented posets, Rank Matrices and q-deformed Markov Numbers”, arXiv:2206.05517 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.