Twisted Jacquet module conjecture for cuspidal representations of GL(2n)

Let FnF_n be the unique degree-nn extension of FF, let G=GL(2n,F)G=\operatorname{GL}(2n,F), and let AM(n,F)A\in\operatorname{M}(n,F) be the matrix specified in the source. Let HA=M1×M2H_A=M_1\times M_2 and UA=U1×U2U_A=U_1\times U_2, where M1,M2,U1,U2M_1,M_2,U_1,U_2 are the corresponding subgroups of GL(n,F)\operatorname{GL}(n,F), and let NN, ψA\psi_A, MψAM_{\psi_A}, and μ\mu be as defined in the source. For a regular character θ\theta of Fn×F_n^{\times}, let π=πθ\pi=\pi_\theta be the associated irreducible cuspidal representation of GG. Twisted Jacquet module conjecture. Then

πN,ψAθF×indUAHAμ\pi_{N,\psi_A}\simeq \theta|_{F^{\times}}\otimes\operatorname{ind}_{U_A}^{H_A}\mu

as MψAM_{\psi_A}-modules. This conjecture is motivated by explicit calculations for GL(4,F)\operatorname{GL}(4,F) and GL(6,F)\operatorname{GL}(6,F); its status is not determined by the supplied source context.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kumar Balasubramanian and Himanshi Khurana, “On a Twisted Jacquet module of GL(6) over a finite field”, arXiv:2206.02634 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.