The principal-polynomial support-reduction conjecture

From papers

Assume the hypotheses of the paper's supported-subset definition, including (a,b,m,n)Q(a,b,m,n)\in\mathcal{Q} and the associated objects S,E,F,αS,E^\circ,F^\circ,\alpha^\circ. Fix [uF,vF]\ell\in[\mathrm{u}_F,\mathrm{v}_F], and let P1P_1 be the projection to the quotient by LL. Suppose that BB is supported with respect to (S,E,F,α)(S,E^\circ,F^\circ,\alpha^\circ) and that P1(xj)=0P_1(x_j)=0 for j[+1,vF]j\in[\ell+1,\mathrm{v}_F].

The principal-polynomial support-reduction conjecture. If EE^\circ is a principal polynomial, then either

P1(x)=0P_1(x_\ell)=0

or there exists a proper subset of BB supported with respect to (S,E,F,α)(S,E^\circ,F^\circ,\alpha^\circ).

The source states that this conjecture implies the Jacobian conjecture. Its resolution status is not supplied.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jacob Glidewell, William E. Hurst, Kyungyong Lee and Li Li, “On the two-dimensional Jacobian conjecture: Magnus' formula revisited, II”, arXiv:2205.12792 (2022).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.