Convergence and complexity of the magnitude-matrix balancing algorithm

Let MRn×nM\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n} be nonnegative, let θ(0,1)\theta\in(0,1), and let TT be the iteration horizon. Define the paper's simultaneous-coordinate heuristic Algorithm~ using the iterates dk[t]d_k[t]. For a fixed tolerance ϵ\epsilon, consider the number of iterations needed to reach that tolerance.

Balancing-algorithm conjecture. Algorithm~ always converges. Moreover, the number of iterations required to reach a given tolerance is O(log(n))O(\log(n)) for fixed ϵ\epsilon, and O(ϵ1)O(\sqrt{\epsilon^{-1}}) for fixed nn.

The conjecture is based on numerical experiments and is intended to justify a distributed heuristic for computing the upper-bound optimization. The source does not provide a convergence proof or establish the stated iteration-rate estimates.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Olle Kjellqvist and John C. Doyle, “ν-Analysis: A New Notion of Robustness for Large Systems with Structured Uncertainties”, arXiv:2204.05359 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.