Ladder generalization of the cusp irreducibility criterion

Let m{\bf m} be a ladder multisegment, let nMultk{\bf n}\in\operatorname{Mult}_k, and let LCk\operatorname{LC}_k, RCk\operatorname{RC}_k, LIk\operatorname{LI}_k, and RIk\operatorname{RI}_k denote the combinatorial and irreducibility conditions in Proposition~. For the one-segment multisegment [a,a][a,a], that proposition identifies LCk([a,a],n){\rm LC}_k([a,a],{\bf n}) with LIk(Z([a,a]),Z(n)){\rm LI}_k({\rm Z}([a,a]),{\rm Z}({\bf n})) and RCk([a,a],n){\rm RC}_k([a,a],{\bf n}) with RIk(Z([a,a]),Z(n)){\rm RI}_k({\rm Z}([a,a]),{\rm Z}({\bf n})).

Ladder generalization conjecture. The same equivalences remain true when [a,a][a,a] is replaced by any ladder m{\bf m}.

This would extend the known criterion from a single segment to arbitrary ladders. The source gives no resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Léa Bittmann and Jian-Rong Li, “On the simplicity of the tensor product of two simple modules of quantum affine algebras”, arXiv:2203.17268 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.