Thurston's K=2K=2 conjecture for conformal maps to domes

Let ΩC\Omega\subset\mathbb{C} be a simply connected domain. Define K(Ω)K(\Omega) as the infimum of the maximal dilatations of quasiconformal maps in F\mathcal{F}, and Keq(Ω)K_{\mathrm{eq}}(\Omega) similarly using the equivariant class Feq\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{eq}}. Thurston's K=2K=2 conjecture. For any simply connected domain ΩC\Omega\subset\mathbb{C},

supΩK(Ω)=supΩKeq(Ω)=2.\sup_{\Omega}K(\Omega)=\sup_{\Omega}K_{\mathrm{eq}}(\Omega)=2.

The conjecture was refuted by counterexamples in both the equivariant and general cases, so it is no longer open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ognjen Tošić, “Confirming Brennan's conjecture numerically on a counterexample to Thurston's K=2 conjecture”, arXiv:2203.02577 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.