Conjecture on approximate invariant manifolds and chaotic dynamics in the three-body problem

About 4 years old · traced to

Let M(E)={(r,G,g):E(r,G,g)=E}{\cal M}({\cal E})=\{({\rm r},{\rm G},{\rm g}):{\rm E}({\rm r},{\rm G},{\rm g})={\cal E}\} be the lifted level manifolds of the Euler integral, and let M0={(r,G,g):E(r,G,g)=r}{\cal M}_0=\{({\rm r},{\rm G},{\rm g}):{\rm E}({\rm r},{\rm G},{\rm g})={\rm r}\}. Consider parameters and a phase-space region where the scale conditions

∥KC∥≫α∥U∥≫∥K~C∥\|{\rm K}_{\rm C}\|\gg\alpha\|{\rm U}\|\gg\|\widetilde{\rm K}_{\rm C}\|

hold. Approximate-invariant-manifold and chaos conjecture. The manifolds M(E){\cal M}({\cal E}) are approximate invariant manifolds for the Hamiltonian H3b,C{\rm H}_{\rm 3b,{\rm C}}, at least while r{\rm r} remains in a fixed region, and the coupling between KC{\rm K}_{\rm C} and U{\rm U}, the disturbing term K~C\widetilde{\rm K}_{\rm C}, and the remainder O2{\rm O}_2 generate chaotic dynamics near M0{\cal M}_0. The conjecture is motivated by the phase portraits and numerical explorations; the supplied text gives no resolution, and the later assertion is explicitly described as the weaker statement supported numerically.

References

Primary source

Sara Di Ruzza and Gabriella Pinzari, “Euler integral as a source of chaos in the three-body problem”, arXiv:2202.12188 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.