Gordon's conjecture on connected sums of Heegaard splittings

About 4 years old · traced to

Let M1=V1⋈F1W1M_1=V_1\bowtie_{F_1}W_1 and M2=V2⋈F2W2M_2=V_2\bowtie_{F_2}W_2 be Heegaard splittings, and call a Heegaard splitting unstabilized if it is not stabilized. Form their connected sum, written

(V1⋈F1W1)#(V2⋈F2W2)=(V1♮V2)⋈F1#F2(W1♮W2).(V_1\bowtie_{F_1}W_1)\#(V_2\bowtie_{F_2}W_2)=(V_1\natural V_2)\bowtie_{F_1\# F_2}(W_1\natural W_2).

Gordon's conjecture. The connected sum of two unstabilized Heegaard splittings is unstabilized.

This is the Heegaard-splitting statement underlying the bridge version discussed in the paper. The source states that Gordon's conjecture was proved by Bachman and independently by Qiu and Scharlemann.

References

Primary source

Jung Hoon Lee, “Unperturbed weakly reducible non-minimal bridge positions”, arXiv:2201.10153 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.