Gordon's conjecture on connected sums of Heegaard splittings

Let M1=V1F1W1M_1=V_1\bowtie_{F_1}W_1 and M2=V2F2W2M_2=V_2\bowtie_{F_2}W_2 be Heegaard splittings, and call a Heegaard splitting unstabilized if it is not stabilized. Form their connected sum, written

(V1F1W1)#(V2F2W2)=(V1V2)F1#F2(W1W2).(V_1\bowtie_{F_1}W_1)\#(V_2\bowtie_{F_2}W_2)=(V_1\natural V_2)\bowtie_{F_1\# F_2}(W_1\natural W_2).

Gordon's conjecture. The connected sum of two unstabilized Heegaard splittings is unstabilized.

This is the Heegaard-splitting statement underlying the bridge version discussed in the paper. The source states that Gordon's conjecture was proved by Bachman and independently by Qiu and Scharlemann.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jung Hoon Lee, “Unperturbed weakly reducible non-minimal bridge positions”, arXiv:2201.10153 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.