Bell–Miles–Ward's rationality–natural-boundary dichotomy for dynamical zeta functions

Let θ:XX\theta:X\rightarrow X be an automorphism of a compact metric abelian group such that N~k(θ)<\tilde{N}_k(\theta)<\infty for every k1k\geq 1, where N~k(θ)\tilde{N}_k(\theta) denotes the number of fixed points of θk\theta^k. Define

ζ~θ(z):=exp(k=1N~k(θ)kzk).\tilde{\zeta}_{\theta}(z):=\operatorname{exp}\left(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\tilde{N}_k(\theta)}{k}z^k\right).

Bell–Miles–Ward's conjecture. The function ζ~θ(z)\tilde{\zeta}_{\theta}(z) is either rational or admits a natural boundary. This is a Pólya–Carlson-type dichotomy for a dynamical zeta function; the source indicates that Bell, Miles, and Ward obtained partial results for a slightly different zeta function, while the general assertion remains unresolved.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Keira Gunn, Khoa D. Nguyen and J. C. Saunders, “Endomorphisms of positive characteristic tori: entropy and zeta function”, arXiv:2112.14812 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.