Bell–Miles–Ward's rationality–natural-boundary dichotomy for dynamical zeta functions
Bell–Miles–Ward's rationality–natural-boundary dichotomy for dynamical zeta functions
Let be an automorphism of a compact metric abelian group such that for every , where denotes the number of fixed points of . Define
Bell–Miles–Ward's conjecture. The function is either rational or admits a natural boundary. This is a Pólya–Carlson-type dichotomy for a dynamical zeta function; the source indicates that Bell, Miles, and Ward obtained partial results for a slightly different zeta function, while the general assertion remains unresolved.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Keira Gunn, Khoa D. Nguyen and J. C. Saunders, “Endomorphisms of positive characteristic tori: entropy and zeta function”, arXiv:2112.14812 (2022).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.