Projective equivalence conjecture for generalized pentagram maps

From papers

Let PP be a (k+3)(k+3)-gon in RPk\mathbb{RP}^k, where k2k\geq 2, and let J=(1,,1)J=(1,\ldots,1). For even kk, let I=(1,,1,2,1,,1)I=(1,\ldots,1,2,1,\ldots,1) with the same number of 11's before and after the 22; for odd kk, let I=(1,1,,1,2,1,,1)I=(1,1,\ldots,1,2,1,\ldots,1) with one more 11 before the 22 than after it. Projective equivalence conjecture. The polygons PP and TI,J(P)T_{I,J}(P) are projectively equivalent. Computer-based experiments suggest that this extends the known projective invariance of pentagons in RP2\mathbb{RP}^2 and hexagons in RP3\mathbb{RP}^3 under suitable generalized pentagram maps; the claim concerns projective self-duality phenomena for polygons in arbitrary higher dimensions and remains unproved in the supplied text.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Chavez-Caliz and Ana C, “Projective Self-dual polygons in higher dimensions”, arXiv:2112.00177 (2021).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.