Hardy–Littlewood–Elliott conjecture

About 5 years old · traced to

Let h1,…,hk,a1,…,aℓh_1,\ldots,h_k,a_1,\ldots,a_\ell be distinct integers, and let f1,…,fk:N→Cf_1,\ldots,f_k:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{C} be 1-bounded multiplicative functions. Define the pretentious distance by

D(f,g;X)=(∑p≤X1−Re⁡(f(p)g(p)‾)p)1/2\mathbb{D}(f,g;X)=\left(\sum_{p\leq X}\frac{1-\operatorname{Re}(f(p)\overline{g(p)})}{p}\right)^{1/2}

and

M(f;X,Q)=inf⁡∣t∣≤Xχ(q), q≤QD(f,n↦nitχ(n);X)2.M(f;X,Q)=\inf_{\substack{|t|\leq X\chi\,(q),\ q\leq Q}}\mathbb{D}\bigl(f,n\mapsto n^{it}\chi(n);X\bigr)^2.

Assume that f1f_1 is non-pretentious, meaning that M(f1;X,Q)→∞M(f_1;X,Q)\to\infty as X→∞X\to\infty for every Q≥1Q\geq1.

Hardy–Littlewood–Elliott conjecture. Then

∑n≤Xf1(n+h1)⋯fk(n+hk)Λ(n+a1)⋯Λ(n+aℓ)=o(X).\sum_{n\leq X}f_1(n+h_1)\cdots f_k(n+h_k)\Lambda(n+a_1)\cdots\Lambda(n+a_\ell)=o(X).

This generalizes the Hardy–Littlewood–Chowla framework from the Möbius function to arbitrary 1-bounded multiplicative functions. The case ℓ=0\ell=0 is identified in the source with Elliott’s conjecture on correlations of multiplicative functions; the general assertion remains open.

References

Primary source

Jared Duker Lichtman and Joni Teräväinen, “On the Hardy-Littlewood-Chowla conjecture on average”, arXiv:2111.08912 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.