Mumford–Tate conjecture for étale cohomology

About 5 years old · traced to

Let XX be a smooth projective variety defined over a number field kk, let ℓ\ell be a prime, and set

H=H⁡2i(X(C),Q(i)).H=\operatorname{H}^{2i}(X(\mathbb{C}),\mathbb{Q}(i)).

Let GℓG_\ell be the generic fiber of the Zariski closure of the image of the ℓ\ell-adic Galois representation on H⁡et⁡2i(X‾,Qℓ(i))\operatorname{H}^{2i}_{\operatorname{et}}(\overline{X},\mathbb{Q}_\ell(i)), and write Gℓ∘G_\ell^\circ for its identity component. Mumford–Tate conjecture. Under the comparison isomorphism

H⁡et⁡2i(X‾,Qℓ(i))≅H⊗Qℓ,\operatorname{H}^{2i}_{\operatorname{et}}(\overline{X},\mathbb{Q}_\ell(i))\cong H\otimes\mathbb{Q}_\ell,

the Mumford–Tate group MT⁡(H)×QQℓ\operatorname{MT}(H)\times_{\mathbb{Q}}\mathbb{Q}_\ell is isomorphic, as an algebraic group, to Gℓ∘G_\ell^\circ. This conjecture predicts that the Hodge-theoretic Mumford–Tate group and the arithmetic ℓ\ell-adic algebraic monodromy group agree after passage to Qℓ\mathbb{Q}_\ell; its status is not resolved in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Sarah Frei, Brendan Hassett and Anthony Várilly-Alvarado, “Reduction of Brauer classes on K3 surfaces, rationality and derived equivalence”, arXiv:2111.08668 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.