Mumford–Tate conjecture for étale cohomology

Let XX be a smooth projective variety defined over a number field kk, let \ell be a prime, and set

H=H2i(X(C),Q(i)).H=\operatorname{H}^{2i}(X(\mathbb{C}),\mathbb{Q}(i)).

Let GG_\ell be the generic fiber of the Zariski closure of the image of the \ell-adic Galois representation on Het2i(X,Q(i))\operatorname{H}^{2i}_{\operatorname{et}}(\overline{X},\mathbb{Q}_\ell(i)), and write GG_\ell^\circ for its identity component. Mumford–Tate conjecture. Under the comparison isomorphism

Het2i(X,Q(i))HQ,\operatorname{H}^{2i}_{\operatorname{et}}(\overline{X},\mathbb{Q}_\ell(i))\cong H\otimes\mathbb{Q}_\ell,

the Mumford–Tate group MT(H)×QQ\operatorname{MT}(H)\times_{\mathbb{Q}}\mathbb{Q}_\ell is isomorphic, as an algebraic group, to GG_\ell^\circ. This conjecture predicts that the Hodge-theoretic Mumford–Tate group and the arithmetic \ell-adic algebraic monodromy group agree after passage to Q\mathbb{Q}_\ell; its status is not resolved in the supplied text.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Sarah Frei, Brendan Hassett and Anthony Várilly-Alvarado, “Reduction of Brauer classes on K3 surfaces, rationality and derived equivalence”, arXiv:2111.08668 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.