Cao–Maulik–Toda genus-zero DT4_4–Gopakumar–Vafa correspondence

Let XX be a Calabi–Yau 44-fold, let βe0\beta e 0 be a curve class, and let τ0(γ)\tau_0(\gamma) be the primary insertion for γ\breakginH4(X,Z)\gamma\break\relax gin H^4(X,\mathbb Z). Denote by n0,β(gamma)n_{0,\beta}(\relax gamma) the genus-zero Gopakumar–Vafa invariant and by GW0,βX(gamma)\mathrm{GW}_{0,\beta}^{X}(\relax gamma) the corresponding Gromov–Witten invariant.

Cao–Maulik–Toda's genus-zero correspondence conjecture. Via some suitable choice of orientation on the moduli space, one has

n0,β(γ)=DT4(X)(βγ),GW0,βX(γ)=kβ1k2DT4(X)(β/kγ).n_{0,\beta}(\gamma)=\mathrm{DT}_4(X)(\beta|\gamma),\qquad \mathrm{GW}_{0,\beta}^{X}(\gamma)=\sum_{k|\beta}\frac{1}{k^2}\mathrm{DT}_4(X)(\beta/k|\gamma).

The two equations are equivalent via the definition of n0,β(γ)n_{0,\beta}(\gamma). The conjecture is known for Calabi–Yau 44-folds with an elliptic structure and for local curves and surfaces, while the general case remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kiryong Chung, Sanghyeon Lee and Joonyeong Won, “Correspondence of Donaldson-Thomas and Gopakumar-Vafa invariants on local Calabi-Yau 4-folds over V_5 and V_22”, arXiv:2109.02087 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.