Monotonicity of the Ronkin function along the Mahler flow

Let P(z,w)=kp(z,w)P(z,w)=k-p(z,w) be a Newton polynomial, and let Rk(x,y)R_k(x,y) denote its Ronkin function at flow parameter k>0k>0. For k2>k1k_2>k_1, distinguish the non-linear, bounded linear, and unbounded linear regions of the amoeba complement for k2k_2. Ronkin monotonicity conjecture. For every fixed (x,y)(x,y) and k2>k1k_2>k_1,

Rk2(x,y)>Rk1(x,y)R_{k_2}(x,y)>R_{k_1}(x,y)

when (x,y)(x,y) lies in a non-linear or bounded linear region for k2k_2, while

Rk2(x,y)=Rk1(x,y)R_{k_2}(x,y)=R_{k_1}(x,y)

when (x,y)(x,y) lies in an unbounded linear facet for k2k_2. For k2>k1kisok_2>k_1\geq k_\textup{iso}, the non-linear region is the liquid phase and a bounded (unbounded) facet is a gas (solid) phase. This extends the proposed monotonicity of Mahler measure to the Ronkin function; the source presents it as an extension without a proof.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jiakang Bao, Yang-Hui He and Ali Zahabi, “Mahler Measure for a Quiver Symphony”, arXiv:2108.13903 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.