The pure-field NIPn conjecture
The pure-field NIPn conjecture
For , a pure field is NIP if no formula in its language has the independence property of order , and it is strictly NIP if it is NIP and has the independence property of order .
Pure-field NIP conjecture. For every , no strictly NIP pure fields exist; equivalently, a pure field is NIP if and only if it is NIP.
The conjecture concerns pure fields; the surrounding text notes that arbitrary additional structure can destroy it, while natural expansions such as valuations or distinguished automorphisms are expected to preserve the phenomenon. No resolution is supplied.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Blaise Boissonneau, “Artin-Schreier extensions and combinatorial complexity in henselian valued fields”, arXiv:2108.12678 (2022).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.