The pure-field NIPn conjecture

About 5 years old · traced to

For n⩾2n\geqslant 2, a pure field is NIPn_n if no formula in its language has the independence property of order nn, and it is strictly NIPn_n if it is NIPn_n and has the independence property of order n−1n-1.

Pure-field NIPn_n conjecture. For every n⩾2n\geqslant 2, no strictly NIPn_n pure fields exist; equivalently, a pure field is NIPn_n if and only if it is NIP.

The conjecture concerns pure fields; the surrounding text notes that arbitrary additional structure can destroy it, while natural expansions such as valuations or distinguished automorphisms are expected to preserve the phenomenon. No resolution is supplied.

References

Primary source

Blaise Boissonneau, “Artin-Schreier extensions and combinatorial complexity in henselian valued fields”, arXiv:2108.12678 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.