The NN-th Hankel relaxation Riemann hypothesis

About 5 years old · traced to

Let ρk\rho_k be the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function with positive imaginary part, listed with multiplicity, and define

ηk=Im⁡(ρk)+i(12−Re⁡(ρk)),λk=ηk2.\eta_k=\operatorname{Im}(\rho_k)+i\left(\frac12-\operatorname{Re}(\rho_k)\right),\qquad \lambda_k=\eta_k^2.

Let Λ\Lambda be the entire function

Λ(z)=∏k(1−zλk).\Lambda(z)=\prod_k\left(1-\frac{z}{\lambda_k}\right).

NN-th Hankel relaxation Riemann hypothesis. The function Λ\Lambda is in the NN-th order Laguerre–Pólya class. These are proposed relaxations of the Riemann hypothesis: membership for every NN is equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis, while the source does not establish any fixed-NN relaxation. This condition is also equivalent to positivity of the associated Hankel matrix AN(x)A_N(x) for real xx away from the zeros.

References

Primary source

Kelly Bickel, J. E. Pascoe and Meredith Sargent, “Zero-free regions near a line”, arXiv:2108.04807 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.