Immanant positivity conjecture for Hankel matrices

Let H=(hi,j)i,j0H=(h_{i,j})_{i,j\geq 0} be the Hankel matrix defined in the paper, and for k1k\geq 1 let I=(i1,,ik)I=(i_1,\ldots,i_k) and J=(j1,,jk)J=(j_1,\ldots,j_k) be sequences satisfying

0i1<<ik,0j1<<jk.0\leq i_1<\cdots<i_k,\qquad 0\leq j_1<\cdots<j_k.

Let HI,JH_{I,J} denote the submatrix of HH with rows indexed by II and columns indexed by JJ. For a partition λ\lambda of kk, write ImmλHI,J\mathrm{Imm}_{\lambda}H_{I,J} for its immanant, and let q\geq_q denote coefficientwise nonnegativity in qq. Immanant positivity conjecture. For every such kk, II, JJ, and partition λ\lambda of kk,

ImmλHI,Jq0.\mathrm{Imm}_{\lambda}H_{I,J}\geq_q 0.

This extends the previously proved immanant positivity for a large family of Catalan–Stieltjes matrices and their associated Hankel matrices. It predicts coefficientwise immanant positivity for all minors of the Hankel matrix HH, generalizing determinant-based total positivity; the paper presents it as a conjecture, with no resolution supplied here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ethan Y. H. Li, Grace M. X. Li, Arthur L. B. Yang and Candice X. T. Zhang, “A planar network proof for Hankel total positivity of type B Narayana polynomials”, arXiv:2107.10608 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.