Contravariant-form and Whittaker-vector isomorphism conjecture

From papers

Let η \eta be a character of the nilpotent subalgebra, let UZgU\in\mathcal{Z}_\mathfrak{g}, and let Iη(U)I_\eta(U) be the associated Whittaker-induced module. Denote by ΨIη(U) \Psi_{I_\eta(U)} the vector space of contravariant forms on Iη(U)I_\eta(U), and let H0η(nˉ,Iη(U))H_0^\eta(\bar{\mathfrak{n}},I_\eta(U)) and Hη0(n,(Iη(U)))H^0_\eta(\mathfrak{n},(I_\eta(U))^*) denote the corresponding twisted coinvariants and Whittaker vectors. Contravariant-form isomorphism conjecture. There are linear isomorphisms

ΨIη(U)(H0η(nˉ,Iη(U)))Hη0(n,(Iη(U))).\Psi_{I_\eta(U)}\cong(H_0^\eta(\bar{\mathfrak{n}},I_\eta(U)))^*\cong H^0_\eta(\mathfrak{n},(I_\eta(U))^*).

This packages contravariant forms as linear functionals on twisted coinvariants and as Whittaker vectors in the dual module; the source presents the identifications as a statement, with no resolution information beyond its surrounding proposition and proof.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Adam Brown and Anna Romanov, “Contravariant pairings between standard Whittaker modules and Verma modules”, arXiv:2106.10029 (2022).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.