Contravariant-form and Whittaker-vector isomorphism conjecture

At least 4 years old · documented by

Let η \eta be a character of the nilpotent subalgebra, let U∈ZgU\in\mathcal{Z}_\mathfrak{g}, and let Iη(U)I_\eta(U) be the associated Whittaker-induced module. Denote by ΨIη(U) \Psi_{I_\eta(U)} the vector space of contravariant forms on Iη(U)I_\eta(U), and let H0η(nˉ,Iη(U))H_0^\eta(\bar{\mathfrak{n}},I_\eta(U)) and Hη0(n,(Iη(U))∗)H^0_\eta(\mathfrak{n},(I_\eta(U))^*) denote the corresponding twisted coinvariants and Whittaker vectors. Contravariant-form isomorphism conjecture. There are linear isomorphisms

ΨIη(U)≅(H0η(nˉ,Iη(U)))∗≅Hη0(n,(Iη(U))∗).\Psi_{I_\eta(U)}\cong(H_0^\eta(\bar{\mathfrak{n}},I_\eta(U)))^*\cong H^0_\eta(\mathfrak{n},(I_\eta(U))^*).

This packages contravariant forms as linear functionals on twisted coinvariants and as Whittaker vectors in the dual module; the source presents the identifications as a statement, with no resolution information beyond its surrounding proposition and proof.

References

Primary source

Adam Brown and Anna Romanov, “Contravariant pairings between standard Whittaker modules and Verma modules”, arXiv:2106.10029 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.