Bounded output-density conjecture for LLL and LLL-SP

At least 4 years old · documented by

Let D\mathcal{D} be a “generic” distribution on the set of bases of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and let D∘\mathcal{D}^{\circ} denote the corresponding output distribution of LLL or LLL-SP. Its probability density function is bounded above by a constant CC.

Bounded output-density conjecture. For every such D\mathcal{D}, the probability density function of D∘\mathcal{D}^{\circ} is bounded from above by a constant CC that depends only on nn.

Such a bound would help establish an upper bound on the average root-Hermite factor away from the worst case. The conjecture is motivated by the steady-state analysis of the simplified sandpile process, but the source gives no proof or resolution for LLL or LLL-SP.

Equivalent formulations 1Other wordings

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. The bounded output-density conjecture for LLL and LLL-SP

    Let D\mathcal{D} be a distribution on the set of bases of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and let D∘\mathcal{D}^\circ denote the corresponding output distribution of LLL or LLL-SP. Bounded output-density conjecture. If D\mathcal{D} is generic, then the probability density function of D∘\mathcal{D}^\circ is bounded above by a constant CC depending only on nn. Such a bound would help establish that the average root-Hermite factor is bounded strictly away from the worst-case value, but the conjecture remains open.

    source: Jintai Ding, Seungki Kim, Tsuyoshi Takagi and Yuntao Wang, “LLL and stochastic sandpile models”, arXiv:1804.03285 (2020).

References

Primary source

Jintai Ding, Seungki Kim, Tsuyoshi Takagi, Yuntao Wang and Bo-Yin Yang, “A physical study of the LLL algorithm”, arXiv:2106.02158 (2022).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

The conjecture remains unproved, but a reader has proposed an unverified counterexample showing that the undefined notion of “generic” cannot by itself support the claimed bound.

Ding, Kim, Takagi, Wang, and Yang proposed the bounded output-density conjecture for LLL and LLL-SP in their statistical-physics study, motivated by average-case root-Hermite-factor bounds. The source explicitly presents it as unresolved.

Known results

  • The simplified stochastic sandpile model has a unique steady state and a constant average-versus-worst-case root-Hermite-factor gap (2019).
  • Extending the argument to LLL or LLL-SP remains obstructed by state-dependent increments, noncommuting topplings, and the unknown existence of an LLL steady state.

Posted attempt

A proposed construction concentrates a smooth, full-support input density near a strictly LLL-reduced basis, where LLL acts as the identity, forcing arbitrarily large output density; an analogous shape-coordinate argument is claimed. It therefore claims a counterexample under the concrete regularity conditions discussed, but has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has no verified proof or counterexample; its scope is ambiguous because “generic” is undefined, and the posted counterexample remains an unverified challenge.

Sources

Solutions 1

CounterexampleThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

The published conjecture leaves “generic” mathematically undefined. Under every concrete input-regularity condition stated in the source, the proposed bound is false: it fails even for smooth, strictly positive, full-support input densities arbitrarily close in total variation to any prescribed background distribution. An unspecified additional restriction on “generic” could define a different conjecture.

Fix n≥2n\ge2 and a standard LLL parameter δ<1\delta<1. Identify ordered bases with GLn(R)⊂Rn2\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb R)\subset\mathbb R^{n^2}. The identity basis InI_n is strictly LLL-reduced: all size-reduction coefficients vanish and the Lovász inequalities are strict. Therefore there is an open neighborhood OO of InI_n on which the LLL output map is exactly

T(B)=B.T(B)=B.

Let f0f_0 be any smooth strictly positive full-support probability density, and choose any fixed 0<η<10<\eta<1, as small as desired. Set

fε(B)=(1−η)f0(B)+η(2πε2)−n2/2exp⁡ ⁣(−∥B−In∥F22ε2).f_\varepsilon(B) =(1-\eta)f_0(B) +\eta(2\pi\varepsilon^2)^{-n^2/2} \exp\!\left(-\frac{\|B-I_n\|_F^2}{2\varepsilon^2}\right).

Singular matrices have measure zero, so this is a smooth strictly positive full-support input law on bases, and

dTV(fε,f0)≤η.d_{\mathrm{TV}}(f_\varepsilon,f_0)\le\eta.

For every measurable E⊂OE\subset O, the output distribution satisfies

P(T(B)∈E)≥P(B∈E)=∫Efε(Y) dY.\mathbb P(T(B)\in E) \ge \mathbb P(B\in E) = \int_E f_\varepsilon(Y)\,dY.

Hence its output density gεg_\varepsilon obeys gε≥fεg_\varepsilon\ge f_\varepsilon almost everywhere on OO. By continuity,

∥gε∥∞≥η(2π)−n2/2ε−n2⟶∞.\boxed{ \|g_\varepsilon\|_\infty \ge \eta(2\pi)^{-n^2/2}\varepsilon^{-n^2} \longrightarrow\infty. }

Thus no constant depending only on nn can bound all such output densities.

The obstruction also applies if the intended density is that of the Gram–Schmidt shape coordinates

ri(B)=log⁡∥bi∗∥∥bi+1∗∥,1≤i<n.r_i(B)=\log\frac{\|b_i^*\|}{\|b_{i+1}^*\|}, \qquad 1\le i<n.

Near InI_n, the derivative of B↦(r1,…,rn−1)B\mapsto(r_1,\ldots,r_{n-1}) has rank n−1n-1, since on positive diagonal bases it becomes ri=ti−ti+1r_i=t_i-t_{i+1}. Choose a smooth probability bump of width ε\varepsilon in these local shape coordinates and mix it into any full-support background with weight η\eta. Since LLL is the identity on the bump's support, the output shape density is at least cηε−(n−1)c\eta\varepsilon^{-(n-1)}, again unbounded.

Consequently, a valid repaired statement requires explicit quantitative anti-concentration restrictions on admissible input distributions; smoothness, full support, and arbitrarily small contamination of any reference law do not suffice.

Source: J. Ding, S. Kim, T. Takagi, Y. Wang, and B.-Y. Yang, “A physical study of the LLL algorithm,” Journal of Number Theory 244 (2023), 339–368, Conjecture 6, doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2022.09.013.