Berglund–Hübsch mirror symmetry conjecture for invertible polynomials

About 7 years old · traced to

Let A=(aij)A=(a_{ij}) be an (n+1)×(n+1)(n+1)\times(n+1) integer matrix with nonzero determinant, and define

w(x1,…,xn+1)=∑i=1n+1∏j=1n+1xjaij.{\bf w}(x_1,\ldots,x_{n+1})=\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}\prod_{j=1}^{n+1}x_j^{a_{ij}}.

Let wˇ\check{{\bf w}} be the polynomial associated to ATA^T, let Γw\Gamma_{\bf w} be the finite extension of Gm{\mathbb G}_m defined by the weights preserving w{\bf w}, and let F(wˇ)\mathcal F(\check{{\bf w}}) denote the Fukaya–Seidel category of a Morsification of wˇ\check{{\bf w}}. Berglund–Hübsch mirror symmetry conjecture. There is a quasi-equivalence of idempotent complete A∞A_\infty-categories

F(wˇ)≃mf⁡(An+1,Γw,w),\mathcal F(\check{{\bf w}})\simeq \operatorname{mf}({\mathbb A}^{n+1},\Gamma_{\bf w},{\bf w}),

and there is a full collection of vanishing thimbles Δ1,…,ΔK\Delta_1,\ldots,\Delta_K such that, for A:=end⁡F(wˇ)(⨁iΔi)\mathcal A:=\operatorname{end}_{\mathcal F(\check{{\bf w}})}(\bigoplus_i\Delta_i), the A∞A_\infty-algebra A\mathcal A is quasi-isomorphic to A:=H(A)A:=H(\mathcal A). Thus both categories are quasi-equivalent to perf⁡(A)\operatorname{perf}(A). This is a homological mirror-symmetry statement for invertible polynomials; the source attributes versions to earlier work, but the general conjecture remains open.

References

Primary source

Jonathan David Evans and Yanki Lekili, “Symplectic cohomology of compound Du Val singularities”, arXiv:2104.11713 (2022).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2019–2021). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1903.01351.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.