A permutation identity supporting the Green–Liebeck code conjecture

From papers

For natural numbers k,nk,n, define Pba=b!/(ba)!P^a_b=b!/(b-a)! whenever the indices are defined. Let k,m,nk,m,n be positive integers satisfying 1<2knm1<2k\leq n-m and 1<2km1<2k\leq m. Permutation identity conjecture. For every integer ii with 1ik1\leq i\leq k, one has

Pkki(PnkiPnkmi)=mr=1is=0ki(ir)(kis)Pmrs1r1Pr+s1sPnk+r+smirPkrskis.P^{k-i}_k\left(P^i_{n-k}-P^i_{n-k-m}\right)=m\sum_{r=1}^{i}\sum_{s=0}^{k-i}\binom{i}{r}\binom{k-i}{s}P^{r-1}_{m-r-s-1}P^s_{r+s-1}P^{i-r}_{n-k+r+s-m}P^{k-i-s}_{k-r-s}.

The paper presents this identity as useful for investigating the Green–Liebeck conjecture, but the supplied text gives no proof or resolution.

Progress summary

Open

The displayed identity remains neither proved nor disproved in the available public record, although a separate paper settles the broader conjecture it was intended to support.

The conjecture asserts a double-sum identity for all admissible positive integers k,m,nk,m,n and 1ik1\leq i\leq k. No retrieved source proves or refutes this specific identity.

Broader Green–Liebeck result

A version-2 arXiv paper proves Green and Liebeck’s broader code conjecture for n>2kn>2k, extending their previously known cases 1k31\leq k\leq 3. Its displayed theorem does not identify or establish the permutation identity here.

Current status (as of August 2026): The specific permutation identity remains open, with no recorded proof, counterexample, verification, or claimed resolution; the broader Green–Liebeck conjecture has been reported as proved.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Junyao Pan, “Two Identities”, arXiv:2104.10346 (2021).

Solutions 1

Proof

The identity holds for ALL admissible k,m,nk,m,n and every 1ik1\le i\le k.

Write (u)j=u(u1)(uj+1)(u)_j=u(u-1)\cdots(u-j+1), let

=ki,M=nkm,\ell=k-i,\qquad M=n-k-m,

and note that the hypotheses imply m2k>km\ge2k>k and MkM\ge k. In falling-factorial notation, the proposed identity is

(k)((M+m)i(M)i)=mr=1is=0(ir)(s)(mrs1)r1(r+s1)s(M+r+s)ir(krs)s.(1)(k)_\ell\bigl((M+m)_i-(M)_i\bigr) = m\sum_{r=1}^{i}\sum_{s=0}^{\ell} \binom{i}{r}\binom{\ell}{s} (m-r-s-1)_{r-1}(r+s-1)_s (M+r+s)_{i-r}(k-r-s)_{\ell-s}. \tag{1}

Set j=r+sj=r+s. Dividing (1) by i!!i!\ell! and canceling factorials gives the equivalent identity

(ki)[(M+mi)(Mi)]=j=1kr=1iAm,j,r(kjir)(M+jir),(2)\binom{k}{i} \left[ \binom{M+m}{i}-\binom{M}{i} \right] = \sum_{j=1}^{k}\sum_{r=1}^{i} A_{m,j,r} \binom{k-j}{i-r} \binom{M+j}{i-r}, \tag{2}

where

Am,j,r=mj(jr)(mj1r1)=mr(j1r1)(mj1r1).(3)A_{m,j,r} = \frac{m}{j}\binom{j}{r}\binom{m-j-1}{r-1} = \frac{m}{r}\binom{j-1}{r-1}\binom{m-j-1}{r-1}. \tag{3}

The quantity Am,j,rA_{m,j,r} counts jj-element subsets of a labeled mm-cycle having exactly rr nonempty cyclic runs: choose the positive occupied-run lengths, the positive complementary-gap lengths, and a distinguished vertex, then divide by the rr possible distinguished runs.

Introduce formal variables t,zt,z, and put

B=(1+z)k(1+t/z)M,w=1+t/z1+z.B=(1+z)^k(1+t/z)^M,\qquad w=\frac{1+t/z}{1+z}.

Let CT\operatorname{CT}_{\infty} denote the constant term in the Laurent expansion at z=z=\infty. For jkj\le k,

CT(Bwjtr)=tra0(kja)(M+ja)ta.(4)\operatorname{CT}_{\infty}(Bw^jt^r) = t^r \sum_{a\ge0} \binom{k-j}{a}\binom{M+j}{a}t^a. \tag{4}

For j>kj>k, this constant term is zero: the Laurent series has maximal zz-degree kj<0k-j<0.

The transfer matrix for binary cyclic words, recording occupied vertices by ww and occupied runs by tt, is

T=(1wt1w).T= \begin{pmatrix} 1&wt\\ 1&w \end{pmatrix}.

Its closed walks yield

tr(Tm)=1+wm+j=1m1r1Am,j,rwjtr.(5)\operatorname{tr}(T^m) = 1+w^m+ \sum_{j=1}^{m-1}\sum_{r\ge1}A_{m,j,r}w^jt^r. \tag{5}

Here the first two terms correspond to the all-zero and all-one words. The characteristic roots of TT are

λ1=1+t/z,λ2=1t1+z,\lambda_1=1+t/z, \qquad \lambda_2=\frac{1-t}{1+z},

as their sum is 1+w1+w and their product is w(1t)w(1-t). Hence

tr(Tm)=λ1m+λ2m.\operatorname{tr}(T^m)=\lambda_1^m+\lambda_2^m.

Since m>km>k, both

Bλ2m=(1t)m(1+z)km(1+t/z)MB\lambda_2^m =(1-t)^m(1+z)^{k-m}(1+t/z)^M

and

Bwm=(1+z)km(1+t/z)M+mBw^m =(1+z)^{k-m}(1+t/z)^{M+m}

have strictly negative maximal zz-degree and therefore have zero constant term at infinity.

Multiplying (5) by BB and taking constant terms consequently gives

CT(Bj=1m1r1Am,j,rwjtr)=CT((1+z)k[(1+t/z)M+m(1+t/z)M]).\operatorname{CT}_{\infty} \left( B\sum_{j=1}^{m-1}\sum_{r\ge1} A_{m,j,r}w^jt^r \right) = \operatorname{CT}_{\infty} \left( (1+z)^k \bigl[(1+t/z)^{M+m}-(1+t/z)^M\bigr] \right).

Extract the coefficient of tit^i. By (4), the left side is precisely the right side of (2); the right side is

(ki)[(M+mi)(Mi)].\binom{k}{i} \left[ \binom{M+m}{i}-\binom{M}{i} \right].

This proves (2), and therefore the original permutation identity (1), for every 1ik1\le i\le k.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·