A permutation identity supporting the Green–Liebeck code conjecture

About 5 years old · traced to

For natural numbers k,nk,n, define Pba=b!/(b−a)!P^a_b=b!/(b-a)! whenever the indices are defined. Let k,m,nk,m,n be positive integers satisfying 1<2k≤n−m1<2k\leq n-m and 1<2k≤m1<2k\leq m. Permutation identity conjecture. For every integer ii with 1≤i≤k1\leq i\leq k, one has

Pkk−i(Pn−ki−Pn−k−mi)=m∑r=1i∑s=0k−i(ir)(k−is)Pm−r−s−1r−1Pr+s−1sPn−k+r+s−mi−rPk−r−sk−i−s.P^{k-i}_k\left(P^i_{n-k}-P^i_{n-k-m}\right)=m\sum_{r=1}^{i}\sum_{s=0}^{k-i}\binom{i}{r}\binom{k-i}{s}P^{r-1}_{m-r-s-1}P^s_{r+s-1}P^{i-r}_{n-k+r+s-m}P^{k-i-s}_{k-r-s}.

The paper presents this identity as useful for investigating the Green–Liebeck conjecture, but the supplied text gives no proof or resolution.

References

Primary source

Junyao Pan, “Two Identities”, arXiv:2104.10346 (2021).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A reader has posted a complete proof of the identity, but it has not been independently verified, so the problem is not settled.

The conjecture asks whether the displayed double-sum formula holds for every admissible positive integer k,m,nk,m,n and each ii with 1≤i≤k1\leq i\leq k. Junyao Pan’s 2021 paper presents the identity in work on the Green–Liebeck conjecture, but the supplied paper text does not prove or resolve it.

Posted attempt

A complete proof was posted using a falling-factorial reformulation, a cyclic-word transfer matrix, and constant-term extraction. It claims the identity for all admissible k,m,nk,m,n and 1≤i≤k1\leq i\leq k, but it is reader-written and has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): A complete proof has been claimed but remains unverified; the permutation identity is not established or disproved.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

The identity holds for ALL admissible k,m,nk,m,n and every 1≤i≤k1\le i\le k.

Write (u)j=u(u−1)⋯(u−j+1)(u)_j=u(u-1)\cdots(u-j+1), let

ℓ=k−i,M=n−k−m,\ell=k-i,\qquad M=n-k-m,

and note that the hypotheses imply m≥2k>km\ge2k>k and M≥kM\ge k. In falling-factorial notation, the proposed identity is

(k)ℓ((M+m)i−(M)i)=m∑r=1i∑s=0ℓ(ir)(ℓs)(m−r−s−1)r−1(r+s−1)s(M+r+s)i−r(k−r−s)ℓ−s.(1)(k)_\ell\bigl((M+m)_i-(M)_i\bigr) = m\sum_{r=1}^{i}\sum_{s=0}^{\ell} \binom{i}{r}\binom{\ell}{s} (m-r-s-1)_{r-1}(r+s-1)_s (M+r+s)_{i-r}(k-r-s)_{\ell-s}. \tag{1}

Set j=r+sj=r+s. Dividing (1) by i!ℓ!i!\ell! and canceling factorials gives the equivalent identity

(ki)[(M+mi)−(Mi)]=∑j=1k∑r=1iAm,j,r(k−ji−r)(M+ji−r),(2)\binom{k}{i} \left[ \binom{M+m}{i}-\binom{M}{i} \right] = \sum_{j=1}^{k}\sum_{r=1}^{i} A_{m,j,r} \binom{k-j}{i-r} \binom{M+j}{i-r}, \tag{2}

where

Am,j,r=mj(jr)(m−j−1r−1)=mr(j−1r−1)(m−j−1r−1).(3)A_{m,j,r} = \frac{m}{j}\binom{j}{r}\binom{m-j-1}{r-1} = \frac{m}{r}\binom{j-1}{r-1}\binom{m-j-1}{r-1}. \tag{3}

The quantity Am,j,rA_{m,j,r} counts jj-element subsets of a labeled mm-cycle having exactly rr nonempty cyclic runs: choose the positive occupied-run lengths, the positive complementary-gap lengths, and a distinguished vertex, then divide by the rr possible distinguished runs.

Introduce formal variables t,zt,z, and put

B=(1+z)k(1+t/z)M,w=1+t/z1+z.B=(1+z)^k(1+t/z)^M,\qquad w=\frac{1+t/z}{1+z}.

Let CT⁡∞\operatorname{CT}_{\infty} denote the constant term in the Laurent expansion at z=∞z=\infty. For j≤kj\le k,

CT⁡∞(Bwjtr)=tr∑a≥0(k−ja)(M+ja)ta.(4)\operatorname{CT}_{\infty}(Bw^jt^r) = t^r \sum_{a\ge0} \binom{k-j}{a}\binom{M+j}{a}t^a. \tag{4}

For j>kj>k, this constant term is zero: the Laurent series has maximal zz-degree k−j<0k-j<0.

The transfer matrix for binary cyclic words, recording occupied vertices by ww and occupied runs by tt, is

T=(1wt1w).T= \begin{pmatrix} 1&wt\\ 1&w \end{pmatrix}.

Its closed walks yield

tr⁡(Tm)=1+wm+∑j=1m−1∑r≥1Am,j,rwjtr.(5)\operatorname{tr}(T^m) = 1+w^m+ \sum_{j=1}^{m-1}\sum_{r\ge1}A_{m,j,r}w^jt^r. \tag{5}

Here the first two terms correspond to the all-zero and all-one words. The characteristic roots of TT are

λ1=1+t/z,λ2=1−t1+z,\lambda_1=1+t/z, \qquad \lambda_2=\frac{1-t}{1+z},

as their sum is 1+w1+w and their product is w(1−t)w(1-t). Hence

tr⁡(Tm)=λ1m+λ2m.\operatorname{tr}(T^m)=\lambda_1^m+\lambda_2^m.

Since m>km>k, both

Bλ2m=(1−t)m(1+z)k−m(1+t/z)MB\lambda_2^m =(1-t)^m(1+z)^{k-m}(1+t/z)^M

and

Bwm=(1+z)k−m(1+t/z)M+mBw^m =(1+z)^{k-m}(1+t/z)^{M+m}

have strictly negative maximal zz-degree and therefore have zero constant term at infinity.

Multiplying (5) by BB and taking constant terms consequently gives

CT⁡∞(B∑j=1m−1∑r≥1Am,j,rwjtr)=CT⁡∞((1+z)k[(1+t/z)M+m−(1+t/z)M]).\operatorname{CT}_{\infty} \left( B\sum_{j=1}^{m-1}\sum_{r\ge1} A_{m,j,r}w^jt^r \right) = \operatorname{CT}_{\infty} \left( (1+z)^k \bigl[(1+t/z)^{M+m}-(1+t/z)^M\bigr] \right).

Extract the coefficient of tit^i. By (4), the left side is precisely the right side of (2); the right side is

(ki)[(M+mi)−(Mi)].\binom{k}{i} \left[ \binom{M+m}{i}-\binom{M}{i} \right].

This proves (2), and therefore the original permutation identity (1), for every 1≤i≤k1\le i\le k.