The equivalence of Host–Kra, Weyl, true and algebraic complexity

About 5 years old · traced to

Let t∈N+t\in\mathbb{N}_+ and let P⃗∈R[x,y]t+1\vec{P}\in\mathbb{R}[x,y]^{t+1} be an integral polynomial progression. For each 0⩽i⩽t0\leqslant i\leqslant t, let HKi(P⃗)\mathcal{HK}_i(\vec{P}), Wi(P⃗)\mathcal{W}_i(\vec{P}), Ti(P⃗)\mathcal{T}_i(\vec{P}), and Ai(P⃗)\mathcal{A}_i(\vec{P}) denote respectively the Host–Kra, Weyl, true, and algebraic complexities at ii. Complexity-equivalence conjecture. Then

HKi(P⃗)=Wi(P⃗)=Ti(P⃗)=Ai(P⃗)⩽t−1.\mathcal{HK}_i(\vec{P})=\mathcal{W}_i(\vec{P})=\mathcal{T}_i(\vec{P})=\mathcal{A}_i(\vec{P})\leqslant t-1.

The four notions measure, respectively, the characteristic-factor, higher-order Fourier-analytic, finitary Gowers-norm, and algebraic complexity of a polynomial progression. The conjecture would give a purely algebraic criterion for determining the smallest Host–Kra factor or the smallest Gowers norm controlling the progression.

References

Primary source

Borys Kuca, “On several notions of complexity of polynomial progressions”, arXiv:2104.07339 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.