Existence and chamber invariance conjecture for Seiberg–Witten U(2)U(2) monopole Floer homology

About 5 years old · traced to

Suppose that YY is a closed oriented 33-manifold, and EE is a U(2)U(2) bundle with admissibility condition w=c1(E)∈H2(Y;Z)w=c_1(E)\in H^2(Y;\mathbb{Z}) a non-torsion odd class. Choose a spin-cc structure s\mathfrak{s}, let (S,ρ)(S,\rho) be a spinor bundle representing it, and set V=S⊗EV=S\otimes E, representing the spin-uu structure t\mathfrak{t}. For τ≠π,2πn\tau\neq\pi,2\pi n with n∈Zn\in\mathbb{Z}, consider the Seiberg–Witten U(2)U(2) monopole Floer homology HMU(2)(Y,t,τ)HM_{U(2)}(Y,\mathfrak{t},\tau). Seiberg–Witten U(2)U(2) monopole Floer homology conjecture. It should be possible to define these groups with the following features: the chain complex is built from a suitably perturbed version of the U(2)U(2) monopole equations; its differential counts gradient flow lines modulo R\mathbb{R}-translations of a perturbed U(2)U(2) Chern–Simons–Dirac functional; Novikov coefficients are generally required because of monotonicity issues; the groups are generally Z/2Z\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}-graded; and, if

R\{π,2πn∣n∈Z}=⋃iIi\mathbb{R}\backslash\{\pi,2\pi n\mid n\in\mathbb{Z}\}=\bigcup_i I_i

is the decomposition into disjoint open intervals, then HMU(2)(Y,t,τ)≃HMU(2)(Y,t,τ′)HM_{U(2)}(Y,\mathfrak{t},\tau)\simeq HM_{U(2)}(Y,\mathfrak{t},\tau') whenever τ\tau and τ′\tau' lie in the same interval IiI_i. This proposes a U(2)U(2) monopole Floer theory for admissible bundles and predicts invariance within chambers, while leaving its analytic construction and the stated properties open.

References

Primary source

Mariano Echeverria, “The SO(3) Vortex Equations over Orbifold Riemann Surfaces”, arXiv:2103.11957 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.