Existence and chamber invariance conjecture for Seiberg–Witten U(2)U(2) monopole Floer homology

Suppose that YY is a closed oriented 33-manifold, and EE is a U(2)U(2) bundle with admissibility condition w=c1(E)H2(Y;Z)w=c_1(E)\in H^2(Y;\mathbb{Z}) a non-torsion odd class. Choose a spin-cc structure s\mathfrak{s}, let (S,ρ)(S,\rho) be a spinor bundle representing it, and set V=SEV=S\otimes E, representing the spin-uu structure t\mathfrak{t}. For τπ,2πn\tau\neq\pi,2\pi n with nZn\in\mathbb{Z}, consider the Seiberg–Witten U(2)U(2) monopole Floer homology HMU(2)(Y,t,τ)HM_{U(2)}(Y,\mathfrak{t},\tau). Seiberg–Witten U(2)U(2) monopole Floer homology conjecture. It should be possible to define these groups with the following features: the chain complex is built from a suitably perturbed version of the U(2)U(2) monopole equations; its differential counts gradient flow lines modulo R\mathbb{R}-translations of a perturbed U(2)U(2) Chern–Simons–Dirac functional; Novikov coefficients are generally required because of monotonicity issues; the groups are generally Z/2Z\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}-graded; and, if

R\{π,2πnnZ}=iIi\mathbb{R}\backslash\{\pi,2\pi n\mid n\in\mathbb{Z}\}=\bigcup_i I_i

is the decomposition into disjoint open intervals, then HMU(2)(Y,t,τ)HMU(2)(Y,t,τ)HM_{U(2)}(Y,\mathfrak{t},\tau)\simeq HM_{U(2)}(Y,\mathfrak{t},\tau') whenever τ\tau and τ\tau' lie in the same interval IiI_i. This proposes a U(2)U(2) monopole Floer theory for admissible bundles and predicts invariance within chambers, while leaving its analytic construction and the stated properties open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Mariano Echeverria, “The SO(3) Vortex Equations over Orbifold Riemann Surfaces”, arXiv:2103.11957 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.