Zilber's Zilber–Pink conjecture for distinguished categories

About 5 years old · traced to

Let KK be an algebraically closed field and let C\mathfrak{C} be a distinguished category over KK. A distinguished variety is an object of C\mathfrak{C}, and ZP⁡(X,m,d)\operatorname{ZP}(X,m,d) denotes the corresponding Zilber–Pink assertion for a distinguished variety XX and non-negative integers mm and dd. Zilber's conjecture. For every distinguished variety XX and all non-negative integers mm and dd, ZP⁡(X,m,d)\operatorname{ZP}(X,m,d) holds. This is Zilber's version of the Zilber–Pink conjecture, formulated by Habegger and Pila; the paper explains that it is equivalent to Pink's formulation in the presence of the stated axioms.

References

Primary source

Fabrizio Barroero and Gabriel Andreas Dill, “Distinguished categories and the Zilber-Pink conjecture”, arXiv:2103.07422 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.