The case d=3d=3 conjecture for weak and strong extremals of quasiconvex quadratic forms

Let C3{\cal C}_3 be the cone of 3×33\times 3 quasiconvex quadratic forms, let a weak extremal mean an element that cannot be written as a sum of two non-proportional elements of C3{\cal C}_3 modulo null Lagrangians, and let an extreme ray be a one-dimensional face of C3{\cal C}_3. For fC3f\in{\cal C}_3, let detB(y)\det{\mathop{\rm B}(\mathbf y)} denote the determinant of its acoustic tensor.

The case d=3d=3 conjecture. Any non-polyconvex weak extremal fC3f\in {\cal C}_3 is an extreme ray of C3{\cal C}_3. Moreover, if fC3f\in {\cal C}_3 is a non-polyconvex extreme ray of C3{\cal C}_3, then detB(y)\det{\mathop{\rm B}(\mathbf y)} is an extremal polynomial different from a perfect square.

The conjecture proposes that, in dimension three, non-polyconvex weak extremality coincides with extremality of the cone, and that the determinant of the acoustic tensor of every non-polyconvex extreme ray is an extremal polynomial but not a perfect square. The surrounding discussion notes that the perfect-square case is expected to force polyconvexity, but no proof is known.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Davit Harutyunyan and Narek Hovsepyan, “On the extreme rays of the cone of 33 quasiconvex quadratic forms: Extremal determinats vs extremal and polyconvex forms”, arXiv:2102.07334 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.