The case d=3d=3 conjecture for weak and strong extremals of quasiconvex quadratic forms

At least 4 years old · documented by

Let C3{\cal C}_3 be the cone of 3×33\times 3 quasiconvex quadratic forms, let a weak extremal mean an element that cannot be written as a sum of two non-proportional elements of C3{\cal C}_3 modulo null Lagrangians, and let an extreme ray be a one-dimensional face of C3{\cal C}_3. For f∈C3f\in{\cal C}_3, let det⁡B(y)\det{\mathop{\rm B}(\mathbf y)} denote the determinant of its acoustic tensor.

The case d=3d=3 conjecture. Any non-polyconvex weak extremal f∈C3f\in {\cal C}_3 is an extreme ray of C3{\cal C}_3. Moreover, if f∈C3f\in {\cal C}_3 is a non-polyconvex extreme ray of C3{\cal C}_3, then det⁡B(y)\det{\mathop{\rm B}(\mathbf y)} is an extremal polynomial different from a perfect square.

The conjecture proposes that, in dimension three, non-polyconvex weak extremality coincides with extremality of the cone, and that the determinant of the acoustic tensor of every non-polyconvex extreme ray is an extremal polynomial but not a perfect square. The surrounding discussion notes that the perfect-square case is expected to force polyconvexity, but no proof is known.

References

Primary source

Davit Harutyunyan and Narek Hovsepyan, “On the extreme rays of the cone of 33 quasiconvex quadratic forms: Extremal determinats vs extremal and polyconvex forms”, arXiv:2102.07334 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.