Positivity and definiteness of dominant transfer-matrix eigenvectors for real iTRs

From papers

Let \bfx\bfx be a real translationally invariant infinite tensor ring (iTR) with core slices X(i)Rr×rX(i)\in\mathbb{R}^{r\times r}, and let

TX=i=1dX(i)X(i).T_X=\sum_{i=1}^d X(i)\otimes X(i).

Assume that the dominant eigenvalue of TXT_X is simple, and write the corresponding left and right eigenvectors as vL=vec(VL)v_L=\operatorname{vec}(V_L) and vR=vec(VR)v_R=\operatorname{vec}(V_R).

Positivity and definiteness conjecture. The dominant eigenvalue η\eta is real and positive, and

i=1dX(i)TVLX(i)=ηVL,i=1dX(i)VRX(i)T=ηVR,\sum_{i=1}^d X(i)^{\mathsf T}V_LX(i)=\eta V_L,\qquad \sum_{i=1}^d X(i)V_RX(i)^{\mathsf T}=\eta V_R,

where VLV_L and VRV_R are positive definite matrices.

This claim describes the Perron-type structure expected for the transfer matrix governing operations on translationally invariant infinite tensor rings. The supplied parser status is unknown, so the resolution of the claim should be checked in the source or subsequent literature.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Roel Van Beeumen, Lana Periša, Daniel Kressner and Chao Yang, “Solving a Class of Infinite-Dimensional Tensor Eigenvalue Problems by Translational Invariant Tensor Ring Approximations”, arXiv:2102.00146 (2023).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.