Estrada–Mugnolo's Kirchhoff-index ordering conjecture for hubs-biased resistance distances

About 5 years old · traced to

Let GG be a connected graph. Write Rα=1(G)\mathcal{\mathcal{\mathscr{R}}_{\mathnormal{\alpha=1}}}(G) for the Kirchhoff index based on the hubs-repelling resistance distance, Rα=0(G)\mathcal{\mathcal{\mathscr{R}}}_{\alpha=0}(G) for the standard Kirchhoff index, and Rα=−1(G)\mathcal{\mathcal{\mathscr{R}}_{\mathnormal{\alpha=-1}}}(G) for the Kirchhoff index based on the hubs-attracting resistance distance.

Kirchhoff-index ordering conjecture. For α∈{−1,1}\alpha\in\{-1,1\},

Rα=1(G)≥Rα=0(G)≥Rα=−1(G),\mathcal{\mathcal{\mathscr{R}}_{\mathnormal{\alpha=1}}}(G)\geq\mathcal{\mathcal{\mathscr{R}}}_{\alpha=0}(G)\geq\mathcal{\mathcal{\mathscr{R}}_{\mathnormal{\alpha=-1}}}(G),

with equality if and only if GG is regular.

The conjecture was formulated after computational experiments on more than 12,000 connected graphs with 5≤n≤85\leq n\leq 8, and predicts that hubs-repelling navigation gives the largest Kirchhoff index while hubs-attracting navigation gives the smallest. Its general validity is left open in the source.

References

Primary source

Ernesto Estrada and Delio Mugnolo, “Hubs-biased resistance distances on graphs and networks”, arXiv:2101.07103 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.