Dimension conjecture for constant-bond-dimension-two tensor network varieties

About 5 years old · traced to

Let d≥3d\geq 3, let m=(2,…,2)\mathbf{m}=(2,\dots,2), and let n=(n1,…,nd)\mathbf{n}=(n_1,\dots,n_d) with nj≥2n_j\geq 2. For the tensor network variety T ⁣N ⁣Sm,nCd\mathcal{T\!N\!S}^{C_d}_{\mathbf{m},\mathbf{n}}, one expects

dim⁡T ⁣N ⁣Sm,nCd=min⁡{4(∑j=1dnj−d)+1,∏j=1dnj}\dim \mathcal{T\!N\!S}^{C_d}_{\mathbf{m},\mathbf{n}}=\min\left\{4\left(\sum_{j=1}^d n_j-d\right)+1,\prod_{j=1}^d n_j\right\}

except in the following cases: if d=3d=3, n=(2,n2,n3)\mathbf{n}=(2,n_2,n_3) with n2≥3n_2\geq 3, n3≥4n_3\geq 4, and their cyclic permutations; or if d=4d=4, n=(2,n2,2,n4)\mathbf{n}=(2,n_2,2,n_4) with n2,n4≥2n_2,n_4\geq 2, and their cyclic permutations.

Dimension conjecture. For all such dd, m\mathbf{m}, and n\mathbf{n}, the displayed dimension formula holds outside precisely the listed exceptional cases.

The conjecture concerns the dimension of tensor network varieties for cycle graphs with constant bond dimension 22. The authors report differential calculations at random points for d=5,6,7d=5,6,7 supporting the formula, while the exceptional cases for d=3,4d=3,4 are explicitly excluded; the general assertion remains open.

References

Primary source

Alessandra Bernardi, Claudia De Lazzari and Fulvio Gesmundo, “Dimension of Tensor Network varieties”, arXiv:2101.03148 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.