Generalized Fibonacci analogue of the coefficient-statistics rationality conjecture

About 5 years old · traced to

For k≥2k\geq 2, define the generalized Fibonacci numbers by

Fi+1(k)=Fi(k)+Fi−1(k)+⋯+Fi−k+1(k),F_{i+1}^{(k)}=F_i^{(k)}+F_{i-1}^{(k)}+\cdots+F_{i-k+1}^{(k)},

with F1(k)=⋯=Fk(k)=1F_1^{(k)}=\cdots=F_k^{(k)}=1. Let h≥1h\geq 1, (a1,…,ah)∈Ch(a_1,\dots,a_h)\in\mathbb{C}^h, and P(x)∈C[x]P(x)\in\mathbb{C}[x]. Set

Ih,P,n(k)(x)=P(x)∏i=1n(1+a1xFi(k)+a2xFi+1(k)+⋯+ahxFi+h−1(k)).I_{h,P,n}^{(k)}(x)=P(x)\prod_{i=1}^n\left(1+a_1x^{F_i^{(k)}}+a_2x^{F_{i+1}^{(k)}}+\cdots+a_hx^{F_{i+h-1}^{(k)}}\right).

Regarding h,P,kh,P,k as fixed, let cn(p)c_n(p) be the coefficient of xpx^p in Ih,P,n(k)(x)I_{h,P,n}^{(k)}(x), and for α=(α0,…,αm−1)∈Nm\alpha=(\alpha_0,\dots,\alpha_{m-1})\in\mathbb{N}^m define

vh,P,α(k)(n)=∑p≥0cn(p)α0cn(p+1)α1⋯cn(p+m−1)αm−1.v_{h,P,\alpha}^{(k)}(n)=\sum_{p\geq 0}c_n(p)^{\alpha_0}c_n(p+1)^{\alpha_1}\cdots c_n(p+m-1)^{\alpha_{m-1}}.

Generalized Fibonacci analogue conjecture. The generating function

∑n≥0vh,P,α(k)(n)xn\sum_{n\geq 0}v_{h,P,\alpha}^{(k)}(n)x^n

is rational.

This is proposed as a direct generalized-Fibonacci analogue of the preceding conjecture. No resolution status is supplied in the source.

References

Primary source

Richard P. Stanley, “Theorems and Conjectures on Some Rational Generating Functions”, arXiv:2101.02131 (2021).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A reader-written argument claims a complete proof of the conjecture, but no independent verification has appeared, so the result remains unconfirmed.

Richard P. Stanley posed the generalized-Fibonacci rationality conjecture in 2021: for fixed hh, PP, and kk, every stated coefficient statistic should have a rational generating function.

Known results

  • Stanley, 2021: rationality is proved for the restricted product with one-term factors and the sum of coefficient squares, for every k≥2k\geq 2, with an explicit formula.
  • The same paper gives a new proof of the ordinary Fibonacci square-sum case k=2k=2.
  • A related r=3r=3 formula is recorded conjecturally, not proved.

Posted attempt

A reader-written argument claims a complete proof for all k≥2k\geq 2, factor widths, polynomials, complex coefficients, and nonzero exponent compositions, using Pisot contraction and a finite-carry automaton. The argument has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The full conjecture has a complete unverified proof claim, while only the square-sum special case is established in the published record.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

The conjecture holds for every k≥2k\ge2, every factor width h≥1h\ge1, every complex polynomial PP, arbitrary complex factor coefficients, and every nonzero weak composition of mixed-moment exponents.

Write

Qn(X)=P(X)∏i=1n(1+∑j=1hajXFi+j−1(k))=∑p≥0cn(p)Xp.Q_n(X) = P(X)\prod_{i=1}^n \left(1+\sum_{j=1}^h a_jX^{F_{i+j-1}^{(k)}}\right) = \sum_{p\ge0}c_n(p)X^p.

For a nonzero weak composition

α=(α0,…,αs−1),\alpha=(\alpha_0,\ldots,\alpha_{s-1}),

we prove that

V(n)=∑p≥0∏j=0s−1cn(p+j)αjV(n)=\sum_{p\ge0}\prod_{j=0}^{s-1}c_n(p+j)^{\alpha_j}

has a rational generating function.

Let AA be the integer companion matrix of

qk(T)=Tk−Tk−1−⋯−T−1.q_k(T)=T^k-T^{k-1}-\cdots-T-1.

Its unique expanding root β∈(1,2)\beta\in(1,2) is Pisot. Indeed,

(T−1)qk(T)=Tk+1−2Tk+1.(T-1)q_k(T)=T^{k+1}-2T^k+1.

For r>1r>1 sufficiently close to 11,

rk+1+1<2rk,r^{k+1}+1<2r^k,

so Rouché's theorem gives exactly kk roots of (T−1)qk(T)(T-1)q_k(T) inside ∣T∣=r|T|=r. One is 11, and the sole outside root is β\beta. There are no other unit-circle roots, since ∣T∣=1|T|=1 and ∣2−T∣=1|2-T|=1 force T=1T=1. Therefore

Rk=Eu⊕Es,dim⁡Eu=1,A∣Eu=β,ρ(A∣Es)<1.\mathbb R^k=E_u\oplus E_s, \qquad \dim E_u=1, \qquad A|_{E_u}=\beta, \qquad \rho(A|_{E_s})<1.

We first establish a finite-carry principle. Fix any finite alphabet U⊂ZkU\subset\mathbb Z^k, and evolve integer carries by

q0=0,qi+1=Aqi+ui.q_0=0, \qquad q_{i+1}=Aq_i+u_i.

Accept when L(qn)=cL(q_n)=c, where L(q)=q1L(q)=q_1 and c∈Zc\in\mathbb Z is fixed. Choosing a contracting norm on EsE_s, every reachable state satisfies

∥πsqi∥≤max⁡u∈U∥πsu∥1−θ,0<θ<1.\|\pi_s q_i\| \le \frac{\max_{u\in U}\|\pi_su\|}{1-\theta}, \qquad 0<\theta<1.

Normalize the expanding eigenvector as

v=(1,β,…,βk−1),v=(1,\beta,\ldots,\beta^{k-1}),

so L(v)=1L(v)=1. Writing πuq=x(q)v\pi_uq=x(q)v, the acceptance condition and the stable bound uniformly bound x(qn)x(q_n). If qq can be extended by rr letters to an accepting state, projection onto EuE_u gives

∣x(q)∣≤Bf+max⁡u∈U∣x(u)∣β−1,|x(q)| \le B_f+ \frac{\max_{u\in U}|x(u)|}{\beta-1},

independently of rr. Thus every reachable and co-reachable carry lies in a fixed bounded subset of the integer lattice, which contains only finitely many states. The same reasoning works simultaneously for any fixed number of carry coordinates. A finite weighted adjacency matrix MM therefore gives

∑n≥0eTMnb zn=eT(I−zM)−1b∈C(z).\sum_{n\ge0}e^{\mathsf T}M^nb\,z^n = e^{\mathsf T}(I-zM)^{-1}b \in\mathbb C(z).

Now put

R=∑jαj>0R=\sum_j\alpha_j>0

and expand the mixed moment into RR labeled representation rows, assigning exactly αj\alpha_j rows offset jj. Write

P(X)=∑e∈EpeXe,wj=(Fj,…,Fj+k−1)T,Awj=wj+1.P(X)=\sum_{e\in E}p_eX^e, \qquad w_j=(F_j,\ldots,F_{j+k-1})^{\mathsf T}, \qquad Aw_j=w_{j+1}.

For each row vv, select ev∈Ee_v\in E and factor letters

ℓi,v∈{0,1,…,h},\ell_{i,v}\in\{0,1,\ldots,h\},

with w0=0w_0=0 and a0=1a_0=1. Its represented exponent is

Tv=ev+L(∑i=1nAi−1wℓi,v).T_v=e_v+ L\left(\sum_{i=1}^nA^{i-1}w_{\ell_{i,v}}\right).

The mixed-moment condition is

Tv=p+rvT_v=p+r_v

for fixed row offsets rvr_v. Eliminating pp gives, for every v≥2v\ge2,

L(qv)=(rv−r1)−(ev−e1),L(q_v)=(r_v-r_1)-(e_v-e_1),

where, scanning factor positions in reverse order, the carry evolves by

qv⟼Aqv+wℓv−wℓ1.q_v\longmapsto Aq_v+w_{\ell_v}-w_{\ell_1}.

This is exactly the finite-carry situation above, with finite synchronized alphabet

(ℓ1,…,ℓR)∈{0,1,…,h}R(\ell_1,\ldots,\ell_R)\in\{0,1,\ldots,h\}^R

and complex transition weight ∏vaℓv\prod_va_{\ell_v}. Summing over the finitely many choices of PP-monomials preserves rationality.

If a row of offset zero exists, the common base index pp is automatically nonnegative. Otherwise choose the smallest occurring offset

j0=min⁡{j:αj>0}.j_0=\min\{j:\alpha_j>0\}.

The unconstrained automaton also counts only the finitely many extraneous base indices

−j0≤p<0.-j_0\le p<0.

For each fixed exponent bb, the coefficient cn(b)c_n(b) is eventually constant because Fi→∞F_i\to\infty. Therefore the total contribution from these finitely many negative pp is eventually constant in nn, and its generating function is rational. Subtracting it proves

∑n≥0V(n)zn∈C(z).\boxed{\sum_{n\ge0}V(n)z^n\in\mathbb C(z).}

The case P=0P=0 is immediate. The all-zero composition is excluded only because its defining expression would be the divergent sum ∑p≥01\sum_{p\ge0}1.