Continuity and strict monotonicity of the top boundary for a self-affine attractor

At least 4 years old · documented by

Let 0<λ<μ<10 < \lambda < \mu < 1 with λ+μ>1\lambda + \mu > 1, and define

T0(x,y)=(λx,μy),T1(x,y)=(μx+1−μ,λy+1−λ).T_0(x,y)=(\lambda x,\mu y),\qquad T_1(x,y)=(\mu x+1-\mu,\lambda y+1-\lambda).

Let Aλ,μA_{\lambda,\mu} be the attractor of the iterated function system {T0,T1}\{T_0,T_1\}, and define its top boundary by

∂top(Aλ,μ)={(x,y)∈Aλ,μ: for every (x,y′)∈Aλ,μ, y′≤y}.\partial_{top}(A_{\lambda,\mu})=\{(x,y)\in A_{\lambda,\mu}:\text{ for every }(x,y')\in A_{\lambda,\mu},\ y'\leq y\}.

Top-boundary conjecture. For all 0<λ<μ<10 < \lambda < \mu < 1 with λ+μ>1\lambda + \mu > 1, the set ∂top(Aλ,μ)\partial_{top}(A_{\lambda,\mu}) is the graph of a continuous, strictly increasing function.

The paper proves this for a closed subset GG of the parameter space occupying at least 98.3% of it, and computational evidence suggests that such sets GG can be made arbitrarily close to the full parameter space. The conjecture asserts the corresponding property for every admissible parameter pair.

References

Primary source

Kevin G. Hare and Nikita Sidorov, “On a family of Self-Affine IFS whose attractors have a non-fractal top”, arXiv:2101.01798 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.