Continuity and strict monotonicity of the top boundary for a self-affine attractor

Let 0<λ<μ<10 < \lambda < \mu < 1 with λ+μ>1\lambda + \mu > 1, and define

T0(x,y)=(λx,μy),T1(x,y)=(μx+1μ,λy+1λ).T_0(x,y)=(\lambda x,\mu y),\qquad T_1(x,y)=(\mu x+1-\mu,\lambda y+1-\lambda).

Let Aλ,μA_{\lambda,\mu} be the attractor of the iterated function system {T0,T1}\{T_0,T_1\}, and define its top boundary by

top(Aλ,μ)={(x,y)Aλ,μ: for every (x,y)Aλ,μ, yy}.\partial_{top}(A_{\lambda,\mu})=\{(x,y)\in A_{\lambda,\mu}:\text{ for every }(x,y')\in A_{\lambda,\mu},\ y'\leq y\}.

Top-boundary conjecture. For all 0<λ<μ<10 < \lambda < \mu < 1 with λ+μ>1\lambda + \mu > 1, the set top(Aλ,μ)\partial_{top}(A_{\lambda,\mu}) is the graph of a continuous, strictly increasing function.

The paper proves this for a closed subset GG of the parameter space occupying at least 98.3% of it, and computational evidence suggests that such sets GG can be made arbitrarily close to the full parameter space. The conjecture asserts the corresponding property for every admissible parameter pair.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kevin G. Hare and Nikita Sidorov, “On a family of Self-Affine IFS whose attractors have a non-fractal top”, arXiv:2101.01798 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.