The natural consistency-strength conjecture for extensions of ZFC

Let a natural extension of ZFC\mathsf{ZFC} mean an extension of ZFC\mathsf{ZFC} of the kind considered in the large-cardinal hierarchy, and let AA be a large-cardinal axiom (LCA). Its consistency strength is compared by equiconsistency.

Natural consistency-strength conjecture. Any natural extension of ZFC\mathsf{ZFC} is either equiconsistent with ZFC\mathsf{ZFC} or equiconsistent with ZFC+A\mathsf{ZFC}+A, where AA is an LCA. Moreover, the consistency strengths of natural extensions of ZFC\mathsf{ZFC} are well-ordered.

The conjecture is intended to support Steel’s representation of natural theories by worlds in the multiverse. The qualification “natural” is essential, since contrived consistent sentences can have consistency strengths not captured by the large-cardinal scale.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Joan Bagaria and Claudio Ternullo, “Steel's Programme: Evidential Framework, the Core and Ultimate-L”, arXiv:2011.14724 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.