The all-genus log-open correspondence for maximal-boundary log Calabi–Yau surfaces

Let Y(D)Y(D) be a log Calabi–Yau surface with maximal boundary, let dd be a DD-convex curve class, and use the all-genus generating functions Oι1(d)(Yop(D))\mathsf{O}_{\iota^{-1}(d)}(Y^{\rm op}(D)) and Ndlog(Y(D))\mathsf{N}^{\rm \log}_d(Y(D)), together with the quantum numbers [r]q[r]_q and q=exp(i)q=\exp(\mathrm{i}\hbar). The all-genus log-open correspondence.

Oι1(d)(Yop(D))(ilogq)=[1]ql2(1)dDl+1[dDl]qk=1l1(1)dDk+1dDkNdlog(Y(D))(ilogq).\mathsf{O}_{\iota^{-1}(d)}(Y^{\rm op}(D))(-\mathrm{i}\log q)=[1]_q^{l-2}\frac{(-1)^{d\cdot D_l+1}}{[d\cdot D_l]_q}\prod_{k=1}^{l-1}\frac{(-1)^{d\cdot D_k+1}}{d\cdot D_k}\,\mathsf{N}^{\rm \log}_d(Y(D))(-\mathrm{i}\log q).

This is an all-genus qq-analogue of the genus-zero log-open correspondence. The text motivates its simplicity through degeneration and multiple-cover contributions, but gives no resolution of the conjecture in general.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Pierrick Bousseau, Andrea Brini and Michel van Garrel, “Stable maps to Looijenga pairs”, arXiv:2011.08830 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.