The log-open correspondence for maximal-boundary log Calabi–Yau surfaces

About 6 years old · traced to

Let Y(D)Y(D) be a log Calabi–Yau surface with maximal boundary, let dd be a DD-convex curve class, and let Yop(D)=(Y(l)∖D(l),L)Y^{\rm op}(D)=(Y^{(l)}\setminus D^{(l)},L) be the associated open geometry, with relative class identification ι:H⁡2rel(Yop(D),Z)→H⁡2(Y,Z)\iota:\operatorname{H}^{\rm rel}_2(Y^{\rm op}(D),\mathbb{Z})\to\operatorname{H}_2(Y,\mathbb{Z}). The log-open correspondence.

O0;ι−1(d)(Yop(D))=(∏k=1l(−1)d⋅Dk−1d⋅Dk)N0,dlog⁡(Y(D)).O_{0;\iota^{-1}(d)}(Y^{\rm op}(D))=\left(\prod_{k=1}^l\frac{(-1)^{d\cdot D_k-1}}{d\cdot D_k}\right)N^{\log}_{0,d}(Y(D)).

This proposes an equality between genus-zero open Gromov–Witten counts of a Calabi–Yau threefold with Lagrangian boundary conditions and stationary maximal-tangency log invariants of the surface; no resolution is supplied.

References

Primary source

Pierrick Bousseau, Andrea Brini and Michel van Garrel, “Stable maps to Looijenga pairs”, arXiv:2011.08830 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.