Row-equivalency class equality for queue inversion and HHL statistics

At least 5 years old · documented by

Let τ\tau be a filling and let [τ][\tau] denote its row-equivalency class: the set of fillings obtained by independently permuting the entries in each row of τ\tau. For a filling ρ\rho, let quinv⁡(ρ)\operatorname{quinv}(\rho) and inv⁡(ρ)\operatorname{inv}(\rho) denote its queue inversion and HHL inversion statistics, respectively, and let maj⁡(ρ)\operatorname{maj}(\rho) denote its major index.

Row-equivalency class conjecture. For every row-equivalency class [τ][\tau],

∑σ∈[τ]tquinv⁡(σ)qmaj⁡(σ)=∑σ∈[τ]tinv⁡(σ)qmaj⁡(σ).\sum_{\sigma\in[\tau]} t^{\operatorname{quinv}(\sigma)}q^{\operatorname{maj}(\sigma)} = \sum_{\sigma\in[\tau]} t^{\operatorname{inv}(\sigma)}q^{\operatorname{maj}(\sigma)}.

This conjecture would give a bijective explanation for the equality between the tableau formulas for modified Macdonald polynomials using queue inversion weights and HHL weights. The paper presents it as a natural question, and the supplied text gives no evidence that it has been resolved.

References

Primary source

Arvind Ayyer, Olya Mandelshtam and James B. Martin, “Modified Macdonald polynomials and the multispecies zero range process: I”, arXiv:2011.06117 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.