Convergence-rate conjecture for the randomized truncated Milstein method

About 6 years old · traced to

Let y(t)y(t) be the solution of the stochastic differential equation under Assumptions A1, A2, and A3, and let XΔ(t)X_\Delta(t) denote the continuous-time approximation produced by the randomized truncated Milstein method with step size Δ\Delta. For any p>2p>2, assume that Assumptions A1, A2, and A3 hold. Let qˉ>0\bar{q}>0, ε∈(0,1/4)\varepsilon\in(0,1/4), and Δ∈(0,1]\Delta\in(0,1]. Then

Convergence-rate conjecture. There is a constant HH independent of Δ\Delta such that

sup⁡t0≤t≤TE∣y(t)−XΔ(t)∣qˉ≤H(Δmin⁡(1−2ε,α+12)qˉ).\sup_{t_0\leq t\leq T}\mathbb{E}\lvert y(t)-X_\Delta(t)\rvert^{\bar{q}}\leq H\left(\Delta^{\min(1-2\varepsilon,\alpha+\frac{1}{2})\bar{q}}\right).

The conjecture predicts that randomization improves the convergence rate from min⁡(1−2ε,α)\min(1-2\varepsilon,\alpha) to min⁡(1−2ε,α+1/2)\min(1-2\varepsilon,\alpha+1/2); the source states that a proof was still in progress and supports the claim with numerical simulations.

References

Primary source

Juan Liao, Wei Liu and Xiaoyan Wang, “Truncated Milstein method for non-autonomous stochastic differential equations and its modification”, arXiv:2011.00023 (2021).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2020). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2002.04065.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.