The conical kinematics amplitude conjecture

Let K(k,n)\mathcal{K}(k,n) be the kinematic space, let J([n]k)nfJ\in\binom{[n]}{k}^{\mathrm{nf}}, and define

γJ==1k1(α,j(1)α,j+1(1)1),\gamma_J=\sum_{\ell=1}^{k-1}\left(\alpha_{\ell,j_\ell-(\ell-1)}-\alpha_{\ell,j_{\ell+1}-(\ell-1)-1}\right),

where (i,j)[1,k1]×[1,nk+1](i,j)\in[1,k-1]\times[1,n-k+1]. For αR(k1)(nk+1)\alpha\in\mathbb{R}^{(k-1)(n-k+1)}, choose the coordinate functions ss on K(k,n)\mathcal{K}(k,n) by solving ηJ(s)=γJ\eta_J(s)=\gamma_J. Conical kinematics amplitude conjecture. The scattering equations have a unique solution, and

m(k)(In,In)ηJ=γJ=i=1k1(αi,1αi,nk+1j=1nk(αi,jαi,j+1)).m^{(k)}(\mathbb{I}_n,\mathbb{I}_n)\big\vert_{\eta_J=\gamma_J}=\prod_{i=1}^{k-1}\left(\frac{\alpha_{i,1}-\alpha_{i,n-k+1}}{\prod_{j=1}^{n-k}(\alpha_{i,j}-\alpha_{i,j+1})}\right).

This conjectural formula gives an explicit evaluation of the amplitude for conical kinematics and is presented as a generalization of the k=2k=2 construction; the supplied text gives no proof or resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Freddy Cachazo and Nick Early, “Planar Kinematics: Cyclic Fixed Points, Mirror Superpotential, k-Dimensional Catalan Numbers, and Root Polytopes”, arXiv:2010.09708 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.