The Lieb–Thirring constant phase-alternative conjecture

Let d1d\geq1 and let γ\gamma satisfy the constraint defining the admissible Lieb–Thirring regime. Let Lγ,dL_{\gamma,d} be the optimal Lieb–Thirring constant, let Lγ,d(N)L_{\gamma,d}^{(N)} be the best constant when the first NN negative eigenvalues are retained, and let VV be a potential on Rd\mathbb{R}^d. Value of the Lieb–Thirring constant. For all d1d\geq1 and admissible γ\gamma, either there exist NNN\in\mathbb{N} and a potential VLγ+d/2(Rd)V\in L^{\gamma+d/2}(\mathbb{R}^d) with exactly NN negative eigenvalues that optimize the nonperiodic Lieb–Thirring inequality, so that

Lγ,d=Lγ,d(N),L_{\gamma,d}=L_{\gamma,d}^{(N)},

or

Lγ,d(N)<Lγ,dfor all N1,L_{\gamma,d}^{(N)}<L_{\gamma,d}\qquad\text{for all }N\geq1,

and there exists an optimal periodic potential VLlocγ+d/2(Rd)V\in L^{\gamma+d/2}_{\rm loc}(\mathbb{R}^d) optimizing the periodic Lieb–Thirring inequality. This potential may be constant, in which case Lγ,d=Lγ,dscL_{\gamma,d}=L_{\gamma,d}^{\rm sc}, or nonconstant. The conjecture proposes a dichotomy between a finite bound-state optimizer and a periodic optimizer. Results preceding this formulation rule out finite-bound-state optimality in substantial parameter ranges, but do not settle the proposed alternative in general.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Rupert L. Frank, David Gontier and Mathieu Lewin, “The periodic Lieb-Thirring inequality”, arXiv:2010.02981 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.