Kusner's equilateral-set conjecture in finite-dimensional lp spaces
Kusner's equilateral-set conjecture in finite-dimensional lp spaces
For and , let , and let be the maximum cardinality of an equilateral set in this normed space.
Kusner's conjecture.
This is the second equilateral-set question identified by the source as Kusner's conjecture; its resolution is not specified in the supplied text.
Progress summary
A 2026 preprint claims the conjecture is false by exhibiting more points than the dimension-plus-one limit, while many exponents remain unresolved.
Kusner posed the question in 1983: whether every equilateral set in , for , has exactly points. The universal assertion is now known to fail in part of the range, but its precise behavior remains unsettled.
Known results
- The equality holds for in every dimension (classical).
- Swanepoel proved for every .
- Swanepoel constructed sets larger than for every fixed in sufficiently large dimension.
- For even integer , earlier work gives explicit linear upper bounds, including .
2026 partial results and counterexample claim
Ge, Xu, and Zhou claim throughout , with linear bounds on intervals and bounds on complementary intervals. A later preprint claims an exact -point equilateral set in , proving and hence disproving Kusner’s conjecture; the claim is not independently verified in the supplied sources.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture is proved for and disproved for in sufficiently large dimensions; the claimed counterexample would extend disproof to , but remains unverified, and the remaining exponent ranges are open.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Richard Chen, Feng Gui, Jason Tang and Nathan Xiong, “Few distance sets in _p spaces and _p product spaces”, arXiv:2009.12512 (2021).
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.