Zames-Falb multiplier equality conjecture for absolute stability

Let GG be an LTI system, let kNk_N denote its Nyquist gain, and let 0<k<kN0<k<k_N. Suppose there is no suitable LTI Zames-Falb multiplier for G+1/kG+1/k. Zames-Falb multiplier equality conjecture. The Lurye system is not absolutely stable, and hence

kLTIZF=kZF=kAS.k_{LTIZF}=k_{ZF}=k_{AS}.

This conjecture concerns whether the available LTI Zames-Falb multiplier bounds exactly characterize absolute stability; the source repeats it from earlier work, but provides no resolution here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jingfan Zhang, Joaquin Carrasco and William Heath, “Duality bounds for discrete-time Zames-Falb multipliers”, arXiv:2008.11975 (2020).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2017–2020). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1704.02484.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.