The hyperfiniteness conjecture for countable amenable Borel equivalence relations

About 6 years old · traced to

A Borel equivalence relation E⊂X×XE\subset X\times X is countable if every equivalence class is countable. It is hyperfinite if there exist finite Borel equivalence relations E1⊂E2⊂…E_1\subset E_2\subset\dots such that

⋃n=1∞En=E.\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}E_n=E.

It is amenable if there exist Borel functions pn:E→[0,1]p_n:E\to[0,1] such that, for every x∈Xx\in X and n≥1n\geq 1,

∑z≡Expn(x,z)=1,\sum_{z\equiv_E x}p_n(x,z)=1,

and, for every pair x≡Eyx\equiv_E y,

lim⁡n→∞∑z≡Ex∣pn(x,z)−pn(y,z)∣=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{z\equiv_E x}|p_n(x,z)-p_n(y,z)|=0.

The hyperfiniteness conjecture. Every countable amenable Borel equivalence relation is hyperfinite.

Hyperfiniteness implies amenability, so the conjecture asks whether amenability is sufficient for hyperfiniteness in Borel combinatorics. The supplied text identifies this as a classical conjecture and gives no evidence of resolution.

References

Primary source

Gábor Elek, “Uniform hyperfiniteness”, arXiv:2008.10595 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.