The characterization of minimal distal valuation expansions of the integers

Let (Bi)i<ω(B_i)_{i<\omega} be a strictly descending chain of subgroups of Z\mathbb{Z} with B0=ZB_0=\mathbb{Z}, and let v:Zω{}v:\mathbb{Z}\to\omega\cup\{\infty\} be the associated valuation. A valuation expansion (Z,+,0,1,v)(\mathbb{Z},+,0,1,v) is distal when it has the model-theoretic distality property.

Characterization conjecture. Let (Z,+,0,1,v)(\mathbb{Z},+,0,1,v) be distal. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. (Z,+,0,1,v)(\mathbb{Z},+,0,1,v) is a minimal expansion of (Z,+,0,1)(\mathbb{Z},+,0,1).
  2. There is a prime pp such that Bi/Bi+1=p|B_i/B_{i+1}|=p for almost all i<ωi<\omega.
  3. vv is interdefinable with a pp-adic valuation for some prime pp.
  4. The (Z,+,v)(\mathbb{Z},+,v)-induced structure on the value set of vv' is o-minimal for every (Z,+,v)(\mathbb{Z},+,v)-definable valuation vv'.

The paper explains that arbitrary valuation expansions can be dp-minimal and that distal examples need not be minimal. The conjecture proposes that, among distal valuation expansions, minimality is equivalent to eventual prime-sized successive quotients, interdefinability with a pp-adic valuation, and the stated o-minimality condition.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Tim Clausen, “Dp-minimal profinite groups and valuations on the integers”, arXiv:2008.08797 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.