The direct-sum Askey–Wilson quotient conjecture for the centralizer

Let j1,j2,j3j_1,j_2,j_3 be representation labels and let J(j1,j2,j3)\mathcal{J}(j_1,j_2,j_3) be the set of admissible intermediate labels. For each kJ(j1,j2,j3)k\in\mathcal{J}(j_1,j_2,j_3), let AWk(j1,j2,j3)\overline{AW}^{k}(j_1,j_2,j_3) be the quotient of the centrally extended Askey–Wilson algebra obtained by setting αi=χji\alpha_i=\chi_{j_i} and K=χkK=\chi_k, and imposing the four annihilating polynomial relations for AA, BB, DD, and DD' whose roots are indexed by the corresponding sets Sk\mathcal{S}^{k}. Define

AW~(j1,j2,j3)=kJ(j1,j2,j3)AWk(j1,j2,j3).\widetilde{AW}(j_1,j_2,j_3)=\bigoplus_{k\in\mathcal{J}(j_1,j_2,j_3)}\overline{AW}^{k}(j_1,j_2,j_3).

Here Sk(ja,jb,jc)={jJ(ja,jb)kJ(j,jc)}\mathcal{S}^{k}(j_a,j_b,j_c)=\{j\in\mathcal{J}(j_a,j_b)\mid k\in\mathcal{J}(j,j_c)\}, and the four annihilating polynomials have degree dkd_k. The direct-sum Askey–Wilson quotient conjecture. The algebra AW~(j1,j2,j3)\widetilde{AW}(j_1,j_2,j_3) is isomorphic to Cj1,j2,j3\mathcal{C}_{j_1,j_2,j_3}. This gives a decomposition of the centralizer into summands indexed by the possible intermediate labels kk; the supplied text gives no resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Nicolas Crampé, Luc Vinet and Meri Zaimi, “Temperley-Lieb, Birman-Murakami-Wenzl and Askey-Wilson algebras and other centralizers of U_q(sl_2)”, arXiv:2008.04905 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.