The omitted-value conjecture for Herman rings of meromorphic functions

About 6 years old · traced to

Let ff be a general meromorphic function. An omitted point is a point z0∈Cz_0\in\mathbb{C} such that f(z)≠z0f(z)\neq z_0 for every z∈Cz\in\mathbb{C}. A Herman ring is a periodic doubly connected Fatou component on which an iterate of ff is conformally conjugate to an irrational rotation. Omitted-value conjecture. If ff omits at least one point in the plane, then ff does not have any Herman ring. This would extend known non-existence results for meromorphic functions with omitted values, including cases with multiple poles, a single pole, or a pole that is itself an omitted value; the general assertion remains open.

References

Primary source

Subhasis Ghora and Tarakanta Nayak, “On periods of Herman rings and relevant poles”, arXiv:2007.07036 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.