Well-posedness hypothesis for the regularity-class wave equation

Let ρ\rho and T\boldsymbol T be the coefficient fields in the boundary-controlled wave equation, let z0=(grad(w0)ρ1w1)Zκ\boldsymbol z_0=\left(\begin{matrix}\operatorname{grad}(w_0)\\ \rho^{-1}w_1\end{matrix}\right)\in\mathcal Z_\kappa, and let uC2([0,);Uκ)u\in\mathcal C^2([0,\infty);\mathcal U_\kappa) satisfy

u(0)=γ(Tgrad(w0)).u(0)=\gamma_\perp\left(\boldsymbol T\operatorname{grad}(w_0)\right).

Here Xκ=Hκ(div;Ω)×Hκ(Ω) \mathcal X_\kappa=\mathbf H^\kappa(\operatorname{div};\Omega)\times H^\kappa(\Omega) is the energy space, Zκ\mathcal Z_\kappa is the solution space, Uκ=Hκ12(Ω)\mathcal U_\kappa=H^{\kappa-\frac12}(\partial\Omega) is the control space, and Yκ=Hκ+12(Ω)\mathcal Y_\kappa=H^{\kappa+\frac12}(\partial\Omega) is the observation space.

Well-posedness hypothesis. There exists a unique solution zC1([0,);Xκ)C([0,);Zκ)\boldsymbol z\in\mathcal C^1([0,\infty);\mathcal X_\kappa)\cap\mathcal C([0,\infty);\mathcal Z_\kappa) with yC([0,);Yκ)y\in\mathcal C([0,\infty);\mathcal Y_\kappa).

This regularity assertion supplies the continuous well-posedness needed for the subsequent interpolation and convergence analysis. The supplied text presents it as a formal hypothesis and does not establish its resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ghislain Haine, Denis Matignon and Anass Serhani, “Numerical analysis of a structure-preserving space-discretization for an anisotropic and heterogeneous boundary controlled N-dimensional wave equation as port-Hamiltonian system”, arXiv:2006.15032 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.