The kk-linear oscillatory integral estimate for Hrmnder-type operators

About 6 years old · traced to

Let 1≤k≤n1\leq k\leq n, and let (T1,…,Tk)(T_1,\dots,T_k) be a ν\nu-transverse kk-tuple of H"ormander-type operators of the same signature σ\sigma. Thus, if GjG_j denotes the generalised Gauss map associated to TjT_j, then

∣⋀j=1kGj(x;ωj)∣≥ν\left|\bigwedge_{j=1}^kG_j(x;\omega_j)\right|\geq\nu

for all points in the relevant supports. The kk-linear conjecture. For every λ≥1\lambda\geq1, the estimate

∥∏j=1k∣Tjλfj∣1/k∥Lp(Rn)≲ν,ϕ∏j=1k∥fj∥L2(Bn−1)1/k\left\|\prod_{j=1}^k\left|T_j^\lambda f_j\right|^{1/k}\right\|_{L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)}\lesssim_{\nu,\phi}\prod_{j=1}^k\|f_j\|_{L^2(B^{n-1})}^{1/k}

holds whenever p≥pˉ(n,σ,k)p\geq\bar p(n,\sigma,k). The conjecture is the stronger multilinear statement for which the paper's kk-broad theorem serves as a substitute: some extreme cases follow from existing linear, multilinear, or bilinear estimates, while the remaining cases are presented as new and the asserted exponent range is sharp.

References

Primary source

Jonathan Hickman and Marina Iliopoulou, “Sharp L^p estimates for oscillatory integral operators of arbitrary signature”, arXiv:2006.01316 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.