Froese's resonance counting conjecture

Let VV be a super-exponentially decreasing potential, so that its Fourier–Laplace transform V^\widehat V is entire, and let FF be its Froese function,

F(z)=V^(2z)V^(2z)+1.F(z)=\widehat V(2z)\widehat V(-2z)+1.

Assume that V^\widehat V has completely regular growth. Let A(R,θ,φ)={reiαC:rR, α[θ,φ]}A(R,\theta,\varphi)=\{re^{i\alpha}\in\mathbf{C}:r\leq R,\ \alpha\in[\theta,\varphi]\}, let n(R,θ,φ)n(R,\theta,\varphi) count the resonances in this sector, and let N(R,θ,φ)N(R,\theta,\varphi) count the zeros of FF there. Froese's conjecture. In the lower-half plane C\mathbf{C}_-,

n(R,θ,φ)N(R,θ,φ)=o(Rρ).\left|n(R,\theta,\varphi)-N(R,\theta,\varphi)\right|=o(R^\rho).

Here ρ\rho is the order of V^\widehat V (of normal type). Froese proved the conjecture for a large class of potentials, including Gaussians, but the statement is not established in the full generality above.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Aidan Backus, “The Breit-Wigner series for noncompactly supported potentials on the line”, arXiv:2005.13765 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.