Specific hardness assumptions for planted clique variants

Let mm and nn be polynomial in one another. The problems k\textscpc(n,k,1/2)k\textsc{-pc}(n,k,1/2), \textscbpc(m,n,km,kn,1/2)\textsc{bpc}(m,n,k_m,k_n,1/2), k\textscbpc(m,n,km,kn,1/2)k\textsc{-bpc}(m,n,k_m,k_n,1/2), and k\textschpcs(n,k,1/2)k\textsc{-hpc}^s(n,k,1/2) are the stated planted-clique variants. Specific Hardness Assumptions. There is no polynomial-time algorithm solving these problems, respectively, when k=o(n)k=o(\sqrt n); when kn=o(n)k_n=o(\sqrt n) and km=o(m)k_m=o(\sqrt m); when kn=o(n)k_n=o(\sqrt n) and km=o(m)k_m=o(\sqrt m); and, for s3s\ge3, when k=o(n)k=o(\sqrt n). These assumptions provide computational barriers for several secret-leakage planted-clique variants; the paper notes that the kk-hidden-planted-clique assumption is the strongest and implies the other listed assumptions by reductions.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Matthew Brennan and Guy Bresler, “Reducibility and Statistical-Computational Gaps from Secret Leakage”, arXiv:2005.08099 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.