Martin and Thatte's maximum agreement subtree conjecture for balanced trees
Let and be balanced rooted binary phylogenetic -trees, meaning that each has leaves for some non-negative integer and height , and let . Write for the maximum size of a common restriction that is an agreement subtree of and . Martin and Thatte's conjecture.
The conjecture proposed a square-root lower bound for the size of a maximum agreement subtree of two balanced rooted binary phylogenetic trees. It is refuted by the paper's main theorem, which gives, for every , balanced rooted binary trees with maximum agreement subtree of size less than ; hence the conjecture is false.
References
Primary source
Magnus Bordewich, Simone Linz, Megan Owen, Katherine St. John, Charles Semple and Kristina Wicke, “On the maximum agreement subtree conjecture for balanced trees”, arXiv:2005.07357 (2020).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.