Martin and Thatte's maximum agreement subtree conjecture for balanced trees

About 6 years old · traced to

Let S{\mathcal S} and T{\mathcal T} be balanced rooted binary phylogenetic XX-trees, meaning that each has 2m2^m leaves for some non-negative integer mm and height mm, and let n=∣X∣n=|X|. Write mast(S,T){\rm mast}({\mathcal S},{\mathcal T}) for the maximum size of a common restriction that is an agreement subtree of S{\mathcal S} and T{\mathcal T}. Martin and Thatte's conjecture.

mast(S,T)≥n12.{\rm mast}({\mathcal S},{\mathcal T})\geq n^{\frac12}.

The conjecture proposed a square-root lower bound for the size of a maximum agreement subtree of two balanced rooted binary phylogenetic trees. It is refuted by the paper's main theorem, which gives, for every c>0c>0, balanced rooted binary trees with maximum agreement subtree of size less than cn12c n^{\frac12}; hence the conjecture is false.

References

Primary source

Magnus Bordewich, Simone Linz, Megan Owen, Katherine St. John, Charles Semple and Kristina Wicke, “On the maximum agreement subtree conjecture for balanced trees”, arXiv:2005.07357 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.