Martin and Thatte's maximum agreement subtree conjecture for balanced trees

Let S{\mathcal S} and T{\mathcal T} be balanced rooted binary phylogenetic XX-trees, meaning that each has 2m2^m leaves for some non-negative integer mm and height mm, and let n=Xn=|X|. Write mast(S,T){\rm mast}({\mathcal S},{\mathcal T}) for the maximum size of a common restriction that is an agreement subtree of S{\mathcal S} and T{\mathcal T}. Martin and Thatte's conjecture.

mast(S,T)n12.{\rm mast}({\mathcal S},{\mathcal T})\geq n^{\frac12}.

The conjecture proposed a square-root lower bound for the size of a maximum agreement subtree of two balanced rooted binary phylogenetic trees. It is refuted by the paper's main theorem, which gives, for every c>0c>0, balanced rooted binary trees with maximum agreement subtree of size less than cn12c n^{\frac12}; hence the conjecture is false.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Magnus Bordewich, Simone Linz, Megan Owen, Katherine St. John, Charles Semple and Kristina Wicke, “On the maximum agreement subtree conjecture for balanced trees”, arXiv:2005.07357 (2020).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.